seismicmike
Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 3
heralde, you are right on, but there's a difference between living in harmony with someone and participating in their sin with them. Jesus ate with the tax collectors and prostitutes, but he didn't go out and collect taxes with them or walk the street with them. When they expressed faith in him, he said "go and sin no more." He did not approve of their behavior or sanction it in any way, he simply reached out to them in love. It's a delicate balance that the church needs to walk as well.
Remember that I'm speaking from the perspective of someone whose conscience tells him that homosexuality is a sin and that participating in it would be sin for him. If the elders of a church do not believe it would be right before God for them to perform a gay marriage, I do not believe they should be forced to.
It's interesting to note that the apostle Paul actually spends some time in 1 Corinthians and Romans on a couple issues that are not sin issues, but he cautions believers to not cause each other to violate conscience. He writes specifically of meat sacrificed to idols. Some believed there was nothing wrong with eating it while others believed that it was tantamount to participating in idolatry. Even over an issue that was not a sin issue, Paul cautioned those who believed they could eat to be careful not to violate the conscience of those who believed they should not eat. This did not mean that they never ate, but that they did it in such a way as to not offend and to not cause the other to stumble.
In the same way, I hope that you can at least take that approach toward these churches. Even if you disagree with their opinion that homosexuality is a sin, at least understand that they believe it is and that requiring them to sanction it in certain ways would violate their conscience.
Does this make sense?
Remember that I'm speaking from the perspective of someone whose conscience tells him that homosexuality is a sin and that participating in it would be sin for him. If the elders of a church do not believe it would be right before God for them to perform a gay marriage, I do not believe they should be forced to.
It's interesting to note that the apostle Paul actually spends some time in 1 Corinthians and Romans on a couple issues that are not sin issues, but he cautions believers to not cause each other to violate conscience. He writes specifically of meat sacrificed to idols. Some believed there was nothing wrong with eating it while others believed that it was tantamount to participating in idolatry. Even over an issue that was not a sin issue, Paul cautioned those who believed they could eat to be careful not to violate the conscience of those who believed they should not eat. This did not mean that they never ate, but that they did it in such a way as to not offend and to not cause the other to stumble.
In the same way, I hope that you can at least take that approach toward these churches. Even if you disagree with their opinion that homosexuality is a sin, at least understand that they believe it is and that requiring them to sanction it in certain ways would violate their conscience.
Does this make sense?