It's good that they're taking a second glance at some of the organizations that might be doing questionable things. That's really all this was and is about. Other than that their CEO can think whatever he wants. People can choose whether or not they want to go there. End of story.
I see their concession as mainly a victory for Capitalism, but in America what else is new?
I'm fairly certain that Cathy and his family will privately donate money to the same anti-gay causes as before, just not under the CFA banner. I disagree with the politics, but that's the responsible way to go about it.
As for what Henson did, they expressed their support for
all people and donated their CFA proceeds to the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation to counter-balance the donations of CFA that could have been construed as tied to their name. That was responsible too.
I'm tired of people citing freedom of speech as some sort of passport to say whatever they want without accountability. That freedom does not exist for anyone. If what you say offends someone, they have the freedom to respond in kind. That's why it's a good policy to be good to one another, especially with those we disagree.
Cathy's statements were initially said as a CFA representative. That's why he was being interviewed in the first place. CFA is a private organization and they have every right to openly say and believe what they wish. However, they could be held legally accountable if those words create a hostile work environment. Lawsuits anyone? This whole situation was unwise. Even many like-minded enterprises would think twice about partnering with such a polarizing company. That's why they were getting the nuttiest of extremists to support them and that just doesn't look good.
What they've done is definitely about money. No doubt. I just think back to 2004 when a candidate could spook the voters by making gay people into the boogymen. We are now a force to be reckoned with. What a difference 8 years makes.