MWoO
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2005
- Messages
- 1,676
- Reaction score
- 1,636
So first off, it is not free, it is tax payer funded. Free implies no cost. There will be a cost in the form of higher taxes. Even Bernie Sanders pie in the sky plan of taxing billionaires 90% would include higher taxes for people earning as low as 29,000 a year.So just asking out of curiosity: how can universal/free health care be implemented here? I am aware that many countries have a free health care system (EXCEPT America), but I haven't looked into how their systems work.
Second. Canada has socialized healthcare. Wait times are WAY longer for what we would consider routine procedures.
Third, there are two studies that usually get pointed to when it comes to healthcare. One is a WHO report that ranked the US 37th next to Slovenia and Cuba. The study the report was based on how well the healthcare system IS doing compared to how well it COULD be doing. So, while we are 37th on the list, that does not mean that we have a bad healthcare system. Basically, it's like if you go to two restaurants, one is McDonalds and the other is a 5 star burger joint. McDonalds is far more efficient and cheaper, but that doesn't mean you get a better burger.
The second study that ranks the US 11. It was based on data surrounding overall health of the population, infant mortality rate, and life expectancy. Obviously the US has an overall health issue that has nothing to do with actual healthcare. There is far too much fast food consumption in the US. We like portions big and we like sugary fatty foods. The problem is food is (at least prior to the current crisis) in such abundance in the US that we have an obesity problem. We also tend to keep people alive longer with health issues. Infant mortality rate is slightly higher partly because we measure infant deaths that other countries do not. Premature babies born less than 21 weeks of age are considered live births that resulted in death if they do not survive. Other countries count these as still born babies so they are not added to the numbers. Also, the US has a higher rate of infant injuries, mostly because of parents not following certain guidelines.
The US has a much higher rate of survival of terminal illnesses like cancer. You are twice as likely to die of breast cancer in the UK where 1 in 2 die. In the US its 1 in 4. Prostate cancer? 57% die in the UK. US? 20%. This holds for most terminable illnesses. Survival in the US is higher.
So yeah... "free" does not mean better.
Also... the US leads the world in creation of new drugs, publication of medical research papers, etc. Makes sense when you look at our illness survival rates.
Does this mean that the US healthcare is perfect? Nope.
Expenses are way too high for things. Partly because we made a habit of suing the crap out of each other in this country with slap suits. This drives up the cost of doing business for hospitals. Malpractice rates shoot up. Doctors need to be paid more to then pay their insurance. College Tuition has been inflated due to the influx of government money in the form of loans. Again, this means doctors look for higher wages to pay off schooling.
Pharmaceuticals are higher here partially due to other countries putting price caps on US drugs. Canada, for example, pays for all prescriptions. They will also refuse to purchase drugs that they deem too expensive. They will literally not buy drug that could save lives if the cost is too high. So what do US companies do? They lower the price so as not to lose the entire Canadian market. Same with other countries. So guess who makes up the difference? The US. We allow other countries to force our own companies to lower prices for their healthcare system. How about we do the opposite?
I could go on and on. In short, no we are not perfect, but as far as quality of care we are very high up there. Do we need to change the system? Sure do. Is socialized healthcare the way to go? Nope.