The Chipmunks' Triumphant Return

wwfpooh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2004
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
64
But even the CGI boys are pantless and wear their normal tops, I would think they'd just do the same with the girls and have dresses and eyelashes...
And Disney characters don't need pants so I don't see why fraggles would need them, their bodies are covered with fur in the first place :smile:
True, but you know how PC people can get, what with getting upset for the wrong reasons.
 

D'Snowth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
38,849
Reaction score
12,813
Aren't you guys exaggerating a bit?

I mean, I still don't even really understand what it means to be "politically correct" or "politically incorrect", but they're CHIPMUNKS for goodness sake! The Chipettes are girl chipmunks, naturally, they're going to give them femme outfits, but I don't see what the big fuss is about, they're going to look like real chipmunks like the boys do, on the cartoon, The Chipettes may have lacked body fur, but they won't in the sequel.
 

wwfpooh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2004
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
64
I just want it done right. I don't want some prissy, soccer mom-esque organization getting its panties in a knot, because of how a fictional character looks. But then, we're dealing with the same types who claimed Harry Potter promoted Satanism or whatever, probably. :frown:
 

D'Snowth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
38,849
Reaction score
12,813
Oh brother.

I don't see the big deal...

I mean look at this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxVazpJo0XU

Everybody's complaining that The Chipettes look too skanky and $lu++y for girls "their age", but um, those dresses are SUPPOSED to fit the song and the style of the music they're performing in this bit! Get over it people!
 

wwfpooh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2004
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
64
Oh brother.

I don't see the big deal...

I mean look at this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxVazpJo0XU

Everybody's complaining that The Chipettes look too skanky and $lu++y for girls "their age", but um, those dresses are SUPPOSED to fit the song and the style of the music they're performing in this bit! Get over it people!
Not to mention that the girls often dressed older than they were in the cartoon, anyway. :big_grin:
 

Redsonga

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
4,167
Reaction score
82
Oh brother.

I don't see the big deal...

I mean look at this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxVazpJo0XU

Everybody's complaining that The Chipettes look too skanky and $lu++y for girls "their age", but um, those dresses are SUPPOSED to fit the song and the style of the music they're performing in this bit! Get over it people!
Those dresses are actually very old fashion :confused:
Sheesh, it is like you can't dress in anything fancy without someone saying you're a blank anymore :stick_out_tongue:
 

wwfpooh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2004
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
64
You can't hardly do anything anymore without something going wrong. Heck, in one case I read online, some kid got suspended from school...for hugging friends.
 

wwfpooh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2004
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
64
What the ****?
Yeah. According to the peice, the stupid school's super-intendant said public displays of affection or whatever disobeyed the handbook, but one wouldn't think that would be applicable to hugging (especially if it's a hug between friends for a sign of goodbye). Sorry, I stand corrected. It was just detention for the student, but even so, this is definate idiocy, with each hug giving extra detentions (and the hugs weren't even full-fledged ones, either).

Here's the article: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003998362_hugs07.html

People these days...*shakes head*
 

D'Snowth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
38,849
Reaction score
12,813
Yeah. According to the peice, the stupid school's super-intendant said public displays of affection or whatever disobeyed the handbook, but one wouldn't think that would be applicable to hugging (especially if it's a hug between friends for a sign of goodbye). Sorry, I stand corrected. It was just detention for the student, but even so, this is definate idiocy, with each hug giving extra detentions (and the hugs weren't even full-fledged ones, either).

Here's the article: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003998362_hugs07.html

People these days...*shakes head*
*Sighs* I keep telling my parents that people don't like to witness "public displays of affection", but do they ever listen to me? Nooooooooooooo!
 
Top