For a couple of years after Steve took the role of Kermit, I couldn't understand why! I could always tell the difference between Jim and his Kermit. I eared a few imitators who I though where better. Than it became more and more difficult to tell them apart. There is something is Jim's voice that isn't there in Steve, and if I don't ear it, I know it's Steve performing, but other than that, I couldn't tell them apart. When I read a interview with Steve on how hard it had been to replace Jim, I started to realise why they chose a great puppeteer over a great imitator. I felt guilty for some of the thing I said about Steve performance.
The Kermit in the AGT and MTV clip doesn't sound (to me ) like either of them. I can recognise a few seconds here and there that it's Kermit, but the not more. Yet what really concerns me to the point of looking daily for news on what's happening is how stiff Kermit looks. He doesn't move like himself, he (and I know this would sound weird to a non-Muppet fan) he looks detached, almost like he didn't care or didn't want to be there. (I know I'm talking about a Muppet, but they always full me into believing they are real.)
He looks too knew, almost unused. I fear the possibility that it's a new Muppet and that he was not made by the creature shop. It would explain the stiffness, and how the puppeteers hand seem to have to work hard just to have a little emotion and how the hand doesn't seem to be in a natural angle. Here is a clip someone posted that will probably make what I'm saying more clear.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPKng8j9Mnw
I've tried to make a Kermit like Muppet once, but it turned out stiff. I understood why when I saw the clip above. Could it be that what's weird about Kermit lately is the Muppet itself more than the just the puppeteer? What do you think?