Seeing what's behind
Hey there, Vic--don't drown, 'kay?
Actually, while I really love and appreciate Steve's Kermit, (which I think only continues to improve and deepen), Jim was truly one of a kind. His Kermit was more emotionally tuned to the characters around him. With Jim at the, um, helm, Kermit was--like Jim--the "papa" figure of the whole group. He encouraged Fozzie, made a few googly eyes at Piggy and allowed Gonzo the creative freedom to just do whatever it was Gonzo did. You can see this very clearly in the first three movies.
I really became a Steve WHitmire fan when I saw IAVMMC, because the Kermit I saw there is much, much more like the Kermit that I knew from the early years. Maybe it's because the show was more emotionally driven than action driven. Maybe it's because of his tender interactions with Fozzie and Piggy (who were also more like their old selves in this movie). (Maybe it's because of the kiss? Aw, sure, but that's not all of it.)
In the movies between the first three and IAVMMC, the characters were just that--characters in a movie. We didn't have any of those lovely breaking the fourth wall moments where we got to see our favorite felt folk. (I have to say that Piggy does come close in AMCC when she says "And I am going to raise you right off the pavement!) This inclusion of the audience was ALWAYS a part of TMS, and made appearences in the movies of that time period as well--witness the fight between Kermit and Piggy in TGMC. In that way, we get to know the muppet "actors' as real people--we get to know what Kermit is really like--not just what he's like on stage. Imagine what a different picture we'd have of Piggy if we ONLY ever saw her ON the stage instead of behind it as well! I think the muppets do best when they stick to the old format of letting us know the characters as people as well as performers. JMHTBHO (just my never to be humble opinion)