My Two Cents Worth
Geez, have I been asleep while this thread was going forward without me! There were several things that caught my eye and ear, and I wanted to comment on them.
Jim Henson didn't just operate like a Mom and Pop shop--he was Dad, the man who kept everything running, but with an eye to what was best for the family as well as what was best for the company. These are big shoes to fill, and several candidates have been mentioned. Let me offer my completely unsolicited comments on this topic.
As for Brian, I think is it patently obvious that, while Brian cares deeply about his father's work and its continuing success, he has already chosen his own path. And I don't think the sort of humor that Brian inevitably seems to descend to is the sort of humor that will best serve the muppets. That may sound snarky, and maybe it is, but it is truthful and frank. For years and years and years, the muppets have managed to get laughs and audiences without sexually explicit and bathroom humor, and most of the younger Mr. Henson's projects wouldn't have any subtance without those two staples. Is he talented? You betcha! He's a force to be reckoned with in a competitive business. Is he getting audiences? Of course! Low humor is now a staple of the business. Is his fresh, innovative, sexually suggestive and puerile humor what we want to see the muppets go to? Not really.... I'm not criticizing Mr. Henson for what he is doing--he is successful and accomplished and certainly doesn't need my approval or my attentive eye to be those things. But asking him to helm his father's work is a lot like the scene in the ill-conceived Muppet Wizard of Oz when Quentin Tarantino tries to help Kermit direct the muppet fight scene. Mr. Tarantino has his own vision, and it isn't the same as the muppets' vision. I think it is wise for us, as fans, to continue to support and applaud Brian Henson (at whatever level we choose) for the things that he is already doing. Congratulations to you, Sir, for your rousing success! But he is already doing what he loves, and that is part of his father's dream, too. We must leave him to it.
Jim Lewis was mentioned as someone to helm the company. Jim is a talented writer. He may well be the best muppet writer out there, but we don't have a lot to compare him to recently, do we? Who else has been allowed to publish books and articles with Disney's sanction? I found his "Look Before You Leap" book full of snappy one-liners and snarky comments--many of which were funny, but sacrificed the "canon" of the character of Kermit for a cheap laugh. And as someone who grew up with the muppets, I took exception at the way he played fast and loose with canon. It sortof of takes away from Kermit's magical journey to Hollywood to become rich and famous--doesn't it?--if his mother was really a talent agent. LB4YL also said that Kermit didn't get legs until he was an adolescent--when he clearly had them in KSY. Even if you forget KSY (which I would like to, sometimes), then it shows a lack of consistency--if anyone still cares about those things except li'l ol' me. And let me just say here--in case it is not painfully obvious--that I am a big believer in the original dream that Jim created. While I recognize that he is gone, and will not come this way again, I mentally can't help running everything new through the filter of his talent. When someone says something--especially in print and in a highly touted and heavily advertised book--that disagrees with Jim's point of view, then I tend to take exception. This is actually what canon law is--the framework of rules that govern how a body operates. If we can't even respect and (Heaven forbid!) bother to actually LOOK UP the things that have already been established, then how ungainly will we be going forward?
(If you know me on these boards, you knew I would get here eventually, but inevitably, so here I go!)
Although I know it has become the favorite pasttime of Kermit to take cheap, unkind and out-of-character shots at Miss Piggy at EVERY opportunity--even creating some when they don't exist!--that was NOT common when Jim was around. The sparring between Kermit and Piggy was heated and intense, but it wasn't just...mean. If you doubt me--look at the transcripts of their interviews back in the day. Or look at the episodes of TMS. Even when he is firing Piggy, his isn't calling her names and making pig jokes. A lot of what we see now is just that--mean, infantile and unkind, and there is a part of me that is very nervous about what sort of shape ANY new show will take if this trend continues to run. If they bring them back every week to snipe and snark at each other in a way that belies their genuine affection--the whole family-ness of the muppets--will I be sorry that they tried? Gosh, I sure hope not, but I'd be an idiot to not recognize that possibility. Would it be stupdendous to see Kermit welcoming us all to the show--any show!--and have him be the same charming, not-quite-sophisticated, patient-with-crazies and generous-with-stage-time-to-questionable-acts amphibian (who occasionally lapses into bouts of arm-waving hysteria) that he has always been? Be still my heart! But what if he's...smarmy, and mean. What if, like Disney's Dr. Doolittle, he thinks it's funnier if he swears a little? What if, like Disney's Life With Derek series, Kermit thinks it's okay to be unkind, unscrupulous and mean--as long as everyone else around you is sappy enough to forgive you all the time.
Let's think about this for a second--which of the muppets movies did the best? Ah, yes--the early ones--the ones that CENTERED AROUND THE ROMANCE BETWEEN THE FROG AND THE PIG. Now, let's look at how successful the muppets have been since SOMEBODY decided that wasn't important.... (sound of crickets chirping) Hmmmm. If I was guessing, I'd say that, whether or not you agree that there is an off-the-screen romance between the frog and the pig, you'd have to acknowledge that they sold more movies and had more success when the storylines were funny, zany and romantic. Doesn't every movie that's out have some sort of romantic twist? (Even if it's barely recognizable between the grunts and gropes.) If I were looking at this from a logical point of view, I guess I'd say, "Wow--the audience seems to like the sweet, funny, un-sarcastic and romantic stories best." If I were Disney, I guess I'd just chalk it up to one big amazing coincidence.
Well, I'm going to hush now. I've said more on this topic than I intended, and more than some will want to hear. I'm going to take my soapbox and stalk away with what's left of my dignity.