I only bought this movie on DVD a couple of months ago, after seeing a friend's taped-off-the-air copy. I've probably watched it a dozen times already. I've been really exploring it the last couple of days because I just found out about three Easter eggs that are on it.
So yeah, I went looking for any threads on this flick and I see a lot of my own thoughts echoed here.
I was just thinking about Fozzie making those additional runs through the lasers (he'd have made three, really) and how tragic and needless that was, since the money wasn't even in that bag anyway. Poor Fozzie.
And I too liked that moment of Gonzo glancing over at Kermit.
There's so much to like in this film. Like how the cell-phones being turned off almost sound like an electronic medley of the Muppet Show theme. Or is that just my wishful thinking?
It doesn't even matter to me that I've never watched a full episode of Scrubs, nor seen Moulin Rouge, nor seen It's A Wonderful Life for that matter. Those references which might 'date' the film are just some added layering. The story still works on its own merit, and the parodies don't detract from the overall tale.
But here's something that I just noticed...
The movie was released in 2002, right?
So, when we're in Piggy's apartment in the Kermitless world, we can see the World Trade Center towers out the window.
I'm trying to wrap my brain around this...
Was the movie perhaps shot in 2001 (before September 11, I mean) and then only aired in 2002?
Or is its setting supposed to be prior to 9-11-2001?
Because otherwise... if it was made in 2002 and the towers were put in that scene as an intentional anachronism... then that means if Kermit had never been born, the Towers would not have been attacked?
And so, at the end of the movie, when Kermit wishes he HAD been born, and things are put back to normal... then I now have this niggling little pang of guilt that saving the Muppet theatre means losing the WTC.
That one little set detail, of those towers out that window in that specific scene, is really confusing me, thematically. It seems to really go counter to the message of the film.
Oh well, has anyone ever seen Kirk Thatcher being interviewed about this?
Dearth