Bear Man
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2004
- Messages
- 284
- Reaction score
- 98
Thanks for taking the time to read through my novella Travis, comment on it, and not take any offence at some of the less than flattering observations I made.
I guess that my pro-Fozzie argument comes from this reasoning, which may be totally not the way the world works: Soliciting a more recognisable character would result in more pre-orders being placed. More pre-orders gives EFX a larger pot of money to begin manufacture. With more money available for manufacture higher quality factories can be sourced and/or factories can be paid a premium to compensate for their reluctance to take on such a small/technically complex task. So in my eyes, inability to take it to take it to the manufacturing stage is actually tied into selecting the wrong product to build. (Granted I never expected actual manufacturing problems to stall the product before it even started. I expected the line to end because scores and scores of Rizzos sat in inventory because the character was not popular enough to warranty its purchase at such a high premium that would be driven by the very nature of the posers).
On a sort-of-related note, I have a vague memory floating around the back of my brain that you had a photo of the incredibly bad first factory attempt at Fozzie. Any chance we could get a look-see at it, just for fun?
And I should also clarify myself around the Sideshow/Star Wars comments. I'm not saying that their other products are not strong, I'm saying that the release schedule model of holding back key characters/characters in their iconic representation, in order to extend the longevity and financial viability of a license is something that they apply to every line they have, and it is actually only something that works with those peculiar Star Wars nuts (all said with love, MuppetCaper, with pure love ;-)) If you look at Sideshow's Lord of the Rings figures the Fellowship remains incomplete because they placed a minor character into the sales line-up early on, and this disrupted the purchasing cycle in a way that the line (already expensive to produce) could not recover from. With Indiana Jones they chose to release Belloq in a non-iconic costume, and then multiple versions of Indy killed customer interest when they were crying out for Marian, or Sallah, or (heaven help us) Short Round. I admit there were some quality issues that compounded the problems, but fundamentally they try to administer all licences to the Star Wars license model and that's a big mistake. Those tactics work for Star Wars - 38 versions of Luke? No worries. What will the next figure release be - C-3PO or R2D2? Nope, it's the third alien from the left who crosses the middle background about 38 minutes into the movie. We'll leave those two droids for later. And there will be a lot of people who will know that character's ret-conned back story and be happy to buy it. No way on earth will this approach work for any other licensed property.
Sorry for yet another essay, but I figure you understand the compulsion I have to write as much as possible. After all, my degrees are also in Theatre, English, and Education. (If you're trying to steal my identity, Travis, you'll find there's not a lot gain from that!)
I guess that my pro-Fozzie argument comes from this reasoning, which may be totally not the way the world works: Soliciting a more recognisable character would result in more pre-orders being placed. More pre-orders gives EFX a larger pot of money to begin manufacture. With more money available for manufacture higher quality factories can be sourced and/or factories can be paid a premium to compensate for their reluctance to take on such a small/technically complex task. So in my eyes, inability to take it to take it to the manufacturing stage is actually tied into selecting the wrong product to build. (Granted I never expected actual manufacturing problems to stall the product before it even started. I expected the line to end because scores and scores of Rizzos sat in inventory because the character was not popular enough to warranty its purchase at such a high premium that would be driven by the very nature of the posers).
On a sort-of-related note, I have a vague memory floating around the back of my brain that you had a photo of the incredibly bad first factory attempt at Fozzie. Any chance we could get a look-see at it, just for fun?
And I should also clarify myself around the Sideshow/Star Wars comments. I'm not saying that their other products are not strong, I'm saying that the release schedule model of holding back key characters/characters in their iconic representation, in order to extend the longevity and financial viability of a license is something that they apply to every line they have, and it is actually only something that works with those peculiar Star Wars nuts (all said with love, MuppetCaper, with pure love ;-)) If you look at Sideshow's Lord of the Rings figures the Fellowship remains incomplete because they placed a minor character into the sales line-up early on, and this disrupted the purchasing cycle in a way that the line (already expensive to produce) could not recover from. With Indiana Jones they chose to release Belloq in a non-iconic costume, and then multiple versions of Indy killed customer interest when they were crying out for Marian, or Sallah, or (heaven help us) Short Round. I admit there were some quality issues that compounded the problems, but fundamentally they try to administer all licences to the Star Wars license model and that's a big mistake. Those tactics work for Star Wars - 38 versions of Luke? No worries. What will the next figure release be - C-3PO or R2D2? Nope, it's the third alien from the left who crosses the middle background about 38 minutes into the movie. We'll leave those two droids for later. And there will be a lot of people who will know that character's ret-conned back story and be happy to buy it. No way on earth will this approach work for any other licensed property.
Sorry for yet another essay, but I figure you understand the compulsion I have to write as much as possible. After all, my degrees are also in Theatre, English, and Education. (If you're trying to steal my identity, Travis, you'll find there's not a lot gain from that!)