Muppet faces on items do promote use of the cookies. You can't state the Muppets should take moral resposiblitity on one case and not another. It's hypocrisy. My statement was not that the Muppets shouldn't be on cookies, it was that being on a navel ring isn't any worse. I think the Muppets should be marketed in many ways.Drtooth said:No ,matter if the cookies are shaped like the Muppets... they are NOT pushing sugar!
Um...nobody is outlawing any foods. The case was always about labeling. Just as nutritional labeling became mandantory in the 90s, transfats should be listed on packaging so parents and consumers know what's in our food. There's nothing at all wrong with that. Many people take the modern labeling for granted, but it hasn't always been there. The suit was over misleading consumers to purchase these items for kids without noting the risks that they are aware of. In the end, we will see change and anything that gives consumers power over their choices is a good thing.These dumba** lawsuits outlawing this stuff for people who want to indulge ... are pretty much gunking up the court systems for REAL problems.
I couldn't agree with you more that people are in charge of their own choices. So let them make decisions without condemnation. My issue was about the moral grandstanding I've been hearing about this product and I was pointing out the hypocrisy in it. Nobody's saying that you have to go out and pierce yourself just like nobody has to go and eat a bunch of cookies because Kermit told them to. Henson is in charge of merchandising deals and I'm sure they took a close look at this one before going forward. I think it's a step in the right direction after the 90s kiddification of the classic Muppet characters.People are in charge of their own choices...But the piercings just creep me out. I mean, I could see Kermit buying a cookie shaped like himself, but he would NOT buy a toungue stud with his face on it... he'd probably faint at the sight of it...I can't be involved with producst the characters would be against themselves.
Diabetes (especially in children) is rampant these days and harms many more people than piercing. It's even a bigger problem than drug use in this country and this is a disease that has the potential to kill. If you are worried about the health issues involved in piercing, you should be worried about sugary foods even more. At least piercing places are required to cite the risks and instruct the consumer about cleaning and use of the product.Drtooth said:Plus... sometimes bad peicrings lead to complications....
just thought I'd add that!
I couldnt agree with you more on this! There was this thing in the news here in Australia that has a bit of relevance to this, A woman got drunk at a pub or bar and she drove home and had an accident causing her to lose her arm I think, she is now taking the bar to court for letting her drink that amount of alcohol and then driving. It is her responsibility not the bar, they could only do so much to prevent this from happening, they cant monitor every customers drinks etc.Drtooth said:Oh... and I'd bet anyone would actually buy Muppet organically grown Celery instead....
No ,matter if the cookies are shaped like the Muppets, Looney Toons, Peanuts, or Larry and Balki of Perfect strangers, they are NOT pushing sugar! If someone is pretty much incompetant and eats sugar and stuff withOUT knowing the dangers, and complaining about their health, they shouldn't eat that stuff period. These dumba** lawsuits outlawing this stuff for people who want to indulge now and again (or like me who just don't care) are pretty much gunking up the court systems for REAL problems like Drug dealers and crooks who cause more pain and suffering than a small cookie shaped like Kermit.