rhyoyarbie said:
Also in the school district I went to as a kid, the students in high school are now required to take four years of science and math because they're going to be tested on it with a standardized test and because everyone in the education field seems to be pushing the idea that this country needs more science and math students.
The state of the US in comparison to other countries is one of the primary reasons. Even two-bit countries in the middle of nowhere are beating us. Some 2nd world countries have better internet than us. China is continuing to develop, US jobs continue to be heavily outsourced ... all because if you understand the scientific method, Baby Jesus will cry, so the US has decided to trump up false piety to keep the population ignorant. It IS important to know more than how to write a basic paragraph. Our country is panicking because it finally hit them that no science/history/math equals no future. Still, it's funny that it takes an "oh crap" moment to figure that out. Take the 60s: did anyone really care about science and math until the Russians beat us to space? No, of course not. It seems the only time we stop being completely lazy is when another country is about two seconds away from winning Civilization, so to speak. We are only a superpower as long as we act like it. Resting on laurels is what Rome and Britain and just about every other empire did ... and they lost power, money, land, and people when they got complacent.
Okay but when it's all set and done, are the things the students learned going to help them find a job once they graduate high school?
I kinda like Europe's system: general education for the first few years, then start filtering people to stuff they like/can handle later. We repeat way too much general crap. If someone comes in mid-year and can't function on a specialized track, then they need to be bumped to a general one and let the others continue on with their day.
Do the high schools themselves even care if the former students can't even get a job even though they performed well on tests and worked hard in school?
Heheheh ... you think that's bad? You PAY for college ... and after the check clears, they could care less about you. I even see colleges put little disclaimers on their commercials about how degrees/certifications don't guarantee jobs ... I guess too many people flamed them for acting like it was a sure thing. And, quite frankly, I still think some sort of clinical/apprenticeship is better anyway. You can always tell the RNs who "worked their way up" (by being CNAs, etc) versus who just waltzed into school and graduated. The former are helpful, understand the limitations of their jobs, and value teamwork. I've noticed the Nursing School Only types are almost obscenely arrogant, thinking their job is to not get out of their chairs and merely delegate jobs to the poor slobs who work under them, etc. What it takes to pass the test is not always what it takes to be effective in your job. Cutthroat ambition is nice only if you're assured a chance to be at the top when you leave. If you're still gonna have to work your way up, well, good luck with being a jerk. There are lots of PhD's who are jobless because it never occurs to them to "settle" for something beneath them. I've gone to jobs saying I'm perfectly happy picking up Kleenexes off the floor all day if I have to. While I didn't get those jobs, I suspect I'm getting more hours because the hospitals are asking why they'd risk losing someone like that.
Drtooth said:
If they absolutely NEED standardized tests, they should be smaller things accomplished in a small school period.
I'd still much rather see concrete projects that prove you know what you're talking about. Building model roller coasters, doing a "CSI"-type thing, designing a web site, etc ... these, in my mind, actually PROVE beyond a shadow of a doubt that you learned it, not the "eeney-meenie-miney-moe" of standardized testing. Need motivation besides just doing something cool? Go reality TV style and have classes compete for major projects.