Yeah we'll just have to see. I will always say the two party system needs to be expanded, if only to allow non-wealthy people to be serious nominees for President and other positions. I'm sick of being given just two choices of wealthy politians who claim to speak for the people, but don't have a clue what they're going through. I don't think Obama is any different than other politians we've had, and the high expectations placed on him are too much for any President to fulfill. He is not for same sex marriage, and I doubt that will change. And I don't agree with his stance on abortion either. But we shall see how it all goes.
Well you're talking about many things there that don't have to do with the two-party system. All attempts at expansion beyond the two-party system become corrupted by the agendas of the wealthy and I don't see that changing for quite some time. The one change that Obama did bring was in fund raising directly from the people. *That* makes him much different. The rest...time will tell.
He does have quite a responsibility to the average American that no other President has had before. There's no way to make everyone 100% happy, but I find it cynical to say that not enough good can happen under this new administration because of party ties. Now is not the time for the hot-button issue of gay marriage or choice. Right now we're in an endless war abroad, we still have to take our shoes off at the airport, the auto industry has fallen, retail chains are closing stores or going bankrupt and many, many Americans are losing their jobs.
I understand being realistic and not getting swept up in the moment, but now is a time for optimism. Presidents are usually given the first 100 days of office before criticism. We should give the man a chance before we make up our minds. What happens really is anyone's guess. The world can change on a dime. He could be tested in a number of ways we don't even know about yet. Now is a time of possibilities. I'm reserving judgment until his State of the Union next year.