Your Thoughts: "The Muppets" Theatrical Film

Ruahnna

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2003
Messages
1,913
Reaction score
1,152
Oh, and I'm also realllly enjoying Kermit's smug snickering when Miss Piggy trounces Miss Poogy. There's a definite aspect of, 'That my girl!" in his attitude, although he manages to fall back into the "Abyss of Noncommitment" (Is that near the Slough of Despond? Or the Bog of Eternal Stench?) as soon as she is safely back in her dressing room.

He does eventually get his act together, but it is divine watching Piggy shine him on in every conceivable way until he does. Knowing that she loves him so, it must have been very difficult for her to pretend indifference, but she was right to protect herself. It all paid off in the end. Also, how sweet is it that Kermit keeps Piggy's picture in a drawer marked "Beauty Rings"?

When you get a moment, watch the scene where Piggy rallies the troops, but don't watch Piggy--watch the reactions of the others! Teeth is grinning to beat the band, Gonzo seems hopeful and Scooter perks right up.

Here were a few of the touches that I felt put the cap on Piggy's character. When she comes back to the muppets, she re-dons her long, glamorous gloves instead of the short gloves she wears in Paris. It is subtle, but the attention to detail just screams "The diva is back!" Piggy's back-seat driving during the wild ride to the studio is so wonderfully in character. The last thing--and I just love her for this--is that, even when confronting Kermit at the house about the legalities/ethical issues of kidnapping a celebrity, Piggy entreats Kermit, "Come on, Kermit! Don't let these guys down now." We all know she could have said, "Don't let these guys down again," but she doesn't.

I like Kermit waving his arms about his head when yelling for Scooter right when they get to the theater. I like Kermit, all tuxed and spiffed, getting briefed by Scooter with his hand on his hip. I like Kermit's continued politeness to Veronica despite her lack of finesse in dealing with him. I also lack the way that Kermit just absorbs everyone else's disappointment and apparent lack of interest with aplomb (Fozzie is hurt, but proud, Gonzo is distant but secretly yearning), but balks at facing Piggy's scathing disdain until goaded into it by the others.

I keep seeing new things--the mark of a true classic!
 

Mo Frackle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
3,097
Reaction score
2,806
A few other thoughts:

When Gary said to Walter, "Please, Walter. You're my hero", did anybody else almost want Gary to say, "You're on my watch"?

During the scene prior to Kermit's and Piggy's 'make-up' (the "I need you" scene"), at one point in the background Quongo can be seen putting his finger in his ear and then tasting his finger (gross). Fozzie then says to Quongo, "Don't do that!".
 

Ruahnna

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2003
Messages
1,913
Reaction score
1,152
Here I am again, with more to think about. Feel free to add you own stuff!--Surely I am not the ONLY obsessed fan who keeps finding new things to think/talk/write about. (Thank you, Mo, for jumping back in!) And once again, I'm going deep because that's pretty much where I live with this stuff.

I have been thinking A LOT about what The Muppets implies about what happened after Piggy left. I can really picture the painfully slow, steady decline, with everyone who loves Kermit eventually drifting away because they cannot help him any more.

When he let Piggy get away--drove her away, really--with the argument, then it sealed his fate (and everyone else's) and there was really nothing anyone could do to bring him out of his funk if he wouldn't fix it himself. And without him (whom everyone depended on), the entire cast and crew fell apart. I suppose Fozzie was the last to leave, never losing hope that he might not have to go if only...if only....

I can picture Scooter trying to tell him--gently but firmly--that he had to take another job to pay the bills, wanting with all his heart for Kermit to rouse himself out of his stupor and say, "No--don't go. We'll...we'll pull it back together. It will be fine." Or even better, "I'll go get her."

I can picture Floyd trying to explain about what happens to an artist when their woman isn't there to cheer them on, but everything falling on deaf aural organs. I think Floyd might have eventually lost his temper over Kermit's stubbornness, but Dr. Teeth would be there to turn him gently away and shake his head, recognizing the futility of trying to enlighten someone who isn't willing to be enlightened.

What a sad thing to have happened! It hurts my heart to think about it! But how wonderful that everything was restored. I can easily picture the smiling, beaming faces of everyone when they see Kermit walking through their newly-recovered backstage holding tight to Piggy's hand, looking sheepish and embarrassed but absolutely owning it, and owning the delight on their faces at his happiness.

I can see Piggy's radiant contentment at finally being acknowledged as the love of his life in front of everyone. As I have pointed out before, his friends usually helped Piggy in her efforts to ensnare him because they somehow understood that he needed her--whether he wanted to or not! (Shades of Darcy and Elizabeth for all you Jane Austen fans.) Notice how invested each individual character is throughout The Muppets in whether or not Kermit will try to get Piggy back. Although they are glad to come back to do the show, they know that nothing will change, that nothing will last if Piggy isn't there to ground Kermit.

They are all watching Kermit as he gathers up his gumption to go and talk to Piggy--they have been waiting for this moment!--but they know, like Kermit knows, that it may not be enough, that Piggy might leave again anyway. She was not the needy, clingy Piggy they knew before. They are all realizing that she no longer needs Kermit the way he now needs her, but they are hopeful that she still wants him, because she came, after all, to help. But no one knows--not even Piggy--whether she has come to help him get the theater back only to leave again or whether she will decide to stay.

I think how miserable Kermit must have been--unable to perform and entertain, unwilling to go back to the Swamp (and face everyone's knowingness about why he is unhappy), not able to really live in the house she made them, but unable to part with it or abandon it. Hoping and expecting for a long, long time that she might come home on her own and reclaim the house and reclaim him without him having to actually do anything--like apologies and acknowledge how he felt. Hoping that she might just walk through the door at any time--!! But she never did. How many days do you suppose he waited before realizing it wasn't going to happen. Not ever.

Bless his little heart. (You all know--I think, that I'm Southern, so you probably know what that really means.) The more I see this movie, the more I realize what a nuanced performance and a nuanced script we really got. I know that many people have complained that Kermit seemed sad and morose and felt that they contradicted the Kermit that they had always known. But in this story, Kermit simply could not be the frog he had always been, because he had lost everything he wanted and wasn't sure he could get it back. When the idea of the show looms....well, Kermit had been wooing Piggy with the lure of stardom as long as he had known her. And it must have been in the back of his little froggy brain that she might come back for the show if she wouldn't come back for him--which is exactly what happened. I can almost forgive him for still trying to woo her by using the show. "We need you," "It seems that everybody expects us to do a duet..." but I love Piggy for not having any of it--none!

Okay, I think I'm done for a bit. Anybody else want to jump in? The water's deep but it feels very comfy....
 

charlietheowl

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2011
Messages
2,752
Reaction score
1,810
Interesting take. I'd imagine that a lot of his friends had different approaches to try to get Kermit back to work and such. Like you said, I'd imagine Fozzie was the last person hanging on, and even then he probably didn't want to leave at all. Rowlf probably felt really bad as well, but knew that this was something that Kermit had to decide on his own, and therefore left him to his own devices. He would always be willing to listen and provide advice; however, Kermit had to be the one approaching him.

The one character who found this extremely hard to deal with (even though he wasn't in the movie) was probably Robin. He left the swamp to spend time with his uncle and his friends in the theater, and then all that went away. Knowing that his uncle was sad, and that he couldn't do anything about it probably made him feel awful. I'm sure that Rowlf and Fozzie and Gonzo tried to take care of Robin to the best of their abilities, but it wasn't going to be the same for him.
 

Mo Frackle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
3,097
Reaction score
2,806
Wow. Those are some really deep thoughts. And I do really wonder what Robin was going through during all of this. I'm wondering when exactly he left (or was taken away?). We all know why Robin wasn't included in the movie (other than a brief glimpse towards the end). It just would have made the plot more confusing than it already was. Whatever the case, you just can't help but wonder what Robin's side of the story was. Or the others, for that matter.
 

jvcarroll

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
1,660
Reaction score
1,999
Wow. Those are some really deep thoughts. And I do really wonder what Robin was going through during all of this. I'm wondering when exactly he left (or was taken away?). We all know why Robin wasn't included in the movie (other than a brief glimpse towards the end). It just would have made the plot more confusing than it already was. Whatever the case, you just can't help but wonder what Robin's side of the story was. Or the others, for that matter.
Robin needs a better agent!
 

Vincent L

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
5,827
Reaction score
1,135
Robin needs a better agent!
Robin doesn't have an agent.

About the version of Rainbow Connection in this movie, Miss Piggy's voice seems too perfect, without the straining on the high notes like in Never Before, Never Again. Kermit voice seems he might cry at any time.
 

Slackbot

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2010
Messages
3,543
Reaction score
3,155
I've been under a gruesome amount of work-related stress lately. Xanax keeps me from chewing myself to shreds from inside, but it also makes me feel tired and apathetic and wonky. (Hence the lack of decent writing and art outta me lately.)

Today as a pick-me-up I watched The Muppets again, and it did make me feel much better. What a warm, fuzzy (furry, fleecy, feathery, foamy, flocking-y) film! But when I'm on meds my mind goes in odd directions, and I found myself wondering why the Muppet theater and IP would have defaulted to Tex Richman. Lew Lord was the one who had the Standard Rich-and-Famous Contact written up. Wouldn't all that have gone back to him/his company instead? What made Richman the "heir"?

I know, I'm probably overthinking this, or my brain cells are scrambled and I'm missing something obvious. But then, while watching the film I was also looking for seams in puppet faces. I just came into possession of a few yards of antron fleece (WAHOO!) and after a little experimenting to get a feel for it, I can see why some seams, like the one on Walter's lower jaw, tends to be visible while others don't show. Yeah, I can get all left-brained like this and still enjoy the movie. I'm weird that way.
 

Ruahnna

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2003
Messages
1,913
Reaction score
1,152
I might be wrong, but my understanding was that Tex Richman had a deal to buy the theater, (I'm assuming he already put the money in escrow, waiting for the deal to go through) but the Muppets had been given the theater with a defeasible fee ownership. This means the real estate with the theater was probably deeded to them with a defeasance clause, which means that something either must or must not happen for it to change. It this case, the clause must have been, "So long as it is used as the Muppet Theater and for no other purpose." But if they don't act on it, they the sale can go through. What isn't clear then is who--exactly--gets the money. (Sorry--real estate broker in me peeping out--we're always intersted in who gets the money! LOL!)

Seriously, though. The only part of the movie that just doesn't make sense to me--at all--no matter how I think about it, is when Fozzie bangs his head against the scoreboard with the money total. It just doesn't make any sense--none, that they would have so little money and such small corresponding pledges to the changed decimal point. The other thing--doesn't ANYONE have any small change? Piggy went out on the town earlier in the week--she was getting dressed for it when she say "Me Party." She must have been making a hefty salary at Vogue--and she flew to the states (first class, no doubt) in a hurry. She must have some money--at least a dollar. What about Gonzo's money? Even if he blew up the plumbing business, he must have some money in the bank? The scoreboard doesn't just contradict one thing in the moeny--it contradicts everything. I don't understand at all why they put that scene in. (Mutters in bewilderment)
 

Pinkflower7783

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
6,104
Reaction score
3,012
Because if all that happened it would've lost the essence of the film. I learned not to look too much into the film because then I would've enjoyed it less.
 
Top