I'm starting to think that was Roger's plan. He wanted to make us THINK there was a specific reason why they couldn't mention her name when there probably wasn't. It's a VERY sneaky joke relying on "will they or won't they." it took me until after reading the issue to get that.Yeah, Fozzie does start to say Skeeter's name before getting interupted at the beginning and then we do finally get her full name at the end. But given the end and the arc as a whole, i'm just not getting why it needed to be some secret. Everyone had this weird case of amnesia about what Skeeter's name was throughout the arc and it all just seemed unnecessary. It's not like there was some big mystery as to who it was or if somehow Scooter had another or a different sister.
So, on cover B, was Roger's version of Wormwood modeled on someone in particular or was that simply how Langridge "saw" him and would have drawn him if he did the issue art proper?
it goes beyond that. Remember the postponed "Guest Stars" arc? It is my feeling that any tie to Sherlock Holmes in this issue was a mesh of left over Sherlock Holmes guest star issue concepts that were unused. Especially since Sherlock Holmes is going to be the next story arc for the Muppet Classics line. The cover seems like it was left over from guest star arc. I mean, he was paid to draw it, it was finished...
That said, anyone notice the bear resemblance to Sherlock Hemlock? It's all in the shape of the head.