Daffyfan4ever
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2002
- Messages
- 5,043
- Reaction score
- 589
Oh, okay. Thanks for clearing that up.
I don't actually fault Disney for trying it. Muppeteers aren't immortal; emergencies, and unforeseen circumstances and sometimes tragedies occur, thus Disney would be fools not to prepare for the worst and have emergency plans in place should anything happen to one of their key players. Even if fans are kept in the dark, they need to be searching and training understudies so a sudden tragedy doesn't grind all the Muppets plans to a grinding halt for years.I think this thread popped up again because, on the MuppetCast, Steve confirmed that it was Disney's experiment with a replacement Kermit performer and not his availability that resulted in the two Steve-less Kermit appearances. The matter has been resolved and he's stated that it's Disney's choice and there are no hard feelings about it. They tried it and it didn't work. So, it's the official confirmation that kind of started things here, but now that we know there's probably little need for this discussion unless it happens again. But it probably won’t.
I understand why Disney tried that. The top puppeteers probably require a higher fee than younger hungry ones of great talent too. However, I think they soon discovered how it weakens their investment in the Muppets to have these fillers. I'm all for new performers with new characters as long as our classic ones are still headlining too and with their soul performers (until the torch is passed).I don't actually fault Disney for trying it. Muppeteers aren't immortal; emergencies, and unforeseen circumstances and sometimes tragedies occur, thus Disney would be fools not to prepare for the worst and have emergency plans in place should anything happen to one of their key players. Even if fans are kept in the dark, they need to be searching and training understudies so a sudden tragedy doesn't grind all the Muppets plans to a grinding halt for years.
The problem though was (a) the way Disney handled it...code of silence mixed with sudden shock, leaving fans to worry about Steve and automatically have their hackles raised and claws sharpened (b) trying it with not only their top dog character (or "top frog" if you will) but also doing it with someone who simply was not ready for primetime (though perhaps someday he may very well be). The way it was executed, this was an experiment that was destined for failure.
But all in all, despite some bad p.r. (though some corporate beancounters will say any publicity is "good publicity" even if negative...though Toyota would probably currently disagree!) and a really rocky road - all is good, if not better in the end since Disney now knows how disastrous it can be and Steve's place as Kermit is pretty much set in stone now until he can no longer do it. I know this thread had been stormy, it did get ugly for a bit, but i really applaud the moderators for not taking the easy way out and leaving the thread open. The impassioned debates that took place here ultimately helped Disney see the errors in its ways, and drove the fans to take proactive action via Postcards for Steve, flooding Disney with feedback, spreading the word on blogs and articles. Frogs may sadly be an endangered species right now but one very important froggy baby has had his life (and heart and soul) greatly expanded.
That's what I'm HOPING was the problem. After all, Disney lost the voice of Mickey Mouse not too long before, and I wonder if they had anyone else in mind, or they didn't even expect it, causing them to panic, and cause this situation.I don't actually fault Disney for trying it. Muppeteers aren't immortal; emergencies, and unforeseen circumstances and sometimes tragedies occur, thus Disney would be fools not to prepare for the worst and have emergency plans in place should anything happen to one of their key players. Even if fans are kept in the dark, they need to be searching and training understudies so a sudden tragedy doesn't grind all the Muppets plans to a grinding halt for years.
Okay, maybe a bit off-topic here, but that's something I never knew. I knew June was getting up there in years and a recast for Granny might be necessary someday, but I never knew it was because of that. Makes one wonder if Steve had those feelings about somebody else playing Kermit.I remember hearing that June Foray had to re-audition for Granny for Sylvester and Tweety Mysteries (I can't remember is someone posted that here or someone else)... and the only reason she still plays Granny is that she got really angry and told them off. You go, Girl.
Floyd, Robin, and all of Jerry Nelson's Muppet characters have been taken over by Matt Vogel, who is doing an incredible job.I'm also wondering about the characters who don't have official peformers (ex: Floyd, Scooter, Robin, etc.) I know it was said in LTS that Rudman was officially Scooter & Janice, but personally I think they could do better. Still I see what Disney was thinking. I guess they want to concentrate more on the major characters and seeing what can happen in case of emergencies. I can sort of see both sides ot the argument her.
It's a LOOOOONG story, and I can't remember all the details, but from what I can recall, they wanted to go with a Bea Benaderet sound-a-like, even though she rarely played Granny in a Sylverster and Tweety cartoon. June was NOT happy, and I couldn't blame her. Rest assured, this happened in 96, and she was still in great form. After telling the producers off, somehow they decided to give her the role anyway... and great thing too. I just love hearing June Foray, in her sweet little ol' lady voice say (during Mardi Gras) "Here you gpo, Hector... I've got some beads for you! The things I had to do to get these!"Okay, maybe a bit off-topic here, but that's something I never knew. I knew June was getting up there in years and a recast for Granny might be necessary someday, but I never knew it was because of that. Makes one wonder if Steve had those feelings about somebody else playing Kermit.
To take it a step further, Matt got the roles, not only under Jerry's blessing, but he was suggested by the man himself. Now that's what I want to hear with a recast. Suggested by the performers themselves, with their blessing.Floyd, Robin, and all of Jerry Nelson's Muppet characters have been taken over by Matt Vogel, who is doing an incredible job.
Yeah. I heard about that. In fact in Jerry's interview, he mentioned that Matt is now doing the puppeteering for the Count, so I'm guessing he'd be next in line there for whenever Jerry retires from the role.It's a LOOOOONG story, and I can't remember all the details, but from what I can recall, they wanted to go with a Bea Benaderet sound-a-like, even though she rarely played Granny in a Sylverster and Tweety cartoon. June was NOT happy, and I couldn't blame her. Rest assured, this happened in 96, and she was still in great form. After telling the producers off, somehow they decided to give her the role anyway... and great thing too. I just love hearing June Foray, in her sweet little ol' lady voice say (during Mardi Gras) "Here you gpo, Hector... I've got some beads for you! The things I had to do to get these!"
To take it a step further, Matt got the roles, not only under Jerry's blessing, but he was suggested by the man himself. Now that's what I want to hear with a recast. Suggested by the performers themselves, with their blessing.