The Croc Hunter gag still worked for me, even though it would have been funnier if it was the real guy. I wonder why they couldn't get him? He's had a good sense of humor about himself in the past (i.e. getting attacked by the talking crocodile in "Dr. Doolittle 2", which incidentally featured Creature Shop characters). Maybe he was just busy.
The only two times I heard Jerry were as the unseen announcer at the beginning of the Moulin Scrooge thing, and (I think) that was his Statler as well. Even though the balcony was visible in almost every shot, there were only a couple of scenes where Statler and Waldorf were seen in them, so they could have shot those in a single day with Jerry. Robin, Lew and Pops never sounded like themselves. I'm certainly not dissing whoever was performing them, if this is indeed due to an illness of Jerry's. With practice, things should get better -- or, better still, Jerry recovers and is able to be involved in the next project.
The more I think about it, the more I agree that the pacing was off. Things started slowly with the people buying presents in the street; the snowman gag was funny, but it was like two minutes before we saw the Muppets. When they showed up, the movie got interesting and funny again, especially with the "Gift of the Magi" parody. But then Arquette and Whoopi showed up, and the whole thing started moving S-O S-L-O-W. Of course, I always think a Muppet production that focuses a lot of time on the human co-stars can get boring. The only thing I don't like in the admittedly brilliant TMM is the scenes with just Doc Hopper and his assistant. The human subplots never interest me. GMC is my least favorite of the original Muppet trilogy because of all the time spent on Nicky and the other people committing the crime (though admittedly the movie probably deserves more credit than I've given it on here in the past). The humans were entirely supporting characters or in the background in TMTM, my favorite of the three. I like normal live-action movies with people in them...honest!
So I don't know why it never works in a Muppet production for me. But it just doesn't. (Oddly enough, the one time I did like it was the "When Love is Gone" number in MCC -- which is a scene many Muppet fans tend to hate for all the reasons I've listed above. I guess maybe because I knew it was already a part of that story...and the song itself is lovely.)
People are worried that all the current pop-culture references are going to date this film in a few years. I must scratch my head and wonder why this is suddenly an issue. The original TMM is entirely a product of the '70s, with its guest stars that were icons to that period every week, and no one's complaining about that. I've never heard anyone complain about Monsterpiece Theater or Placido Flamingo, either. Yet many people seem to think that the Muppets started referencing pop culture just with this production. Strange.
I'm thrilled at the Neilsen ratings! Yes, NBC's ratings are usually higher than that, and yes, it was second place. But the margin was very small. If CBS had scored a 12 and the Muppets a 6, I would have felt bad. But both networks scored in the 6 range, and CBS' shows were geared to a completely different audience anyway. Honestly, I was terrified that the Brady movie was going to kick the Muppets' butt. But it was the other way around! This did as well as I could hoped for. Now, as has been noted, we just have to wait and see what the demographics were like.
BTW, for those worried about NBC not offering a DVD: I would call and see if you can advance-order a copy. It may just be that they haven't had time to press them yet. And often what isn't advertised on the site can still be ordered on the phone (i.e. I was able to order vol. 11-15 of the Time-Life Muppet videos even though they had taken them off their website). And if NBC hasn't considered doing a DVD, and enough people call and ask for it, it could change their minds!
Luke - Thanks for the news about the theater! Does anyone remember where this was filmed? I'm pretty sure they didn't go back to London and film on Elstree. Also, it's been pointed out that this was a real theater, as opposed to a set created to look like a theater in the past. Previously, they'd have to cut away to show something happening in the audience, for instance, because it wasn't really there in front of Kermit. But here we have Kermit sitting on a stage while the camera pans out into the audience, where all the Muppets are seated. How cool is that?
As for the missing hand rods: it may have been employed before, but this is the first time I was aware of it so much. The Muppets just seemed to have complete freedom of movement in this (i.e. the aforementioned example of Kermit sitting on the stage with apparently nothing underneath him. I know it's an old trick that goes back to TMS's days. I just think it added to the overall effect). I loved it!
A couple of random observations:
When Pepe went out on stage instead of Fozzie, the gag was that he couldn't do Fozzie's job for him. But Fozzie's not a good comedian anyway! He would have bombed just as badly and been heckled just as mercilessly by Statler and Waldorf as Pepe was. That's not a major problem; I just thought it was funny and worth pointing out.
Speaking of which, Statler and Waldorf claim to hate the Muppet productions so much. But does anyone else find it funny that they were still in the balcony, hours after the show had ended, when the Muppets were just hanging around depressed and waiting for Kermit to come back?
Welcome to all our new members! I'm thrilled that we've seen such an influx since the movie, and I hope you all stay around so we can get to know you better. And welcome back, Cory!