Would you vote for Bush or Kerry?

Will you vote for Bush or Kerry?

  • Bush

    Votes: 52 44.8%
  • Kerry

    Votes: 63 54.3%
  • Nadar

    Votes: 1 0.9%

  • Total voters
    116
  • Poll closed .

core

Active Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2004
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Unfortunatly, my opinion doesn't matter, bacause I can't vote for any American president. I can onley vote for the ministers in my own country.

I hope Kerry will win, but I'm afraid Buch will win at least.
 

Docnzhoss

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
973
Reaction score
14
Here's my (fictional) political bumper sticker:

Bush Too Dumb, Kerry Too Wooden
Sam Eagle Just Right!
Vote Same Eagle 2004


In reality, I'll vote Kerry because while every politician lies, Kerry's lies have not caused over 1,000 American deaths and I think he would do more to end things in Iraq rather than keep it going.
 

guysmiley4ever

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2003
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
Docnzhoss said:
Here's my (fictional) political bumper sticker:
Vote Same Eagle 2004
Hmm, maybe Sam 'the American Eagle', can replace Nader on the Ballot.
That should make it more interesting, he's sure more likeable :attitude:
 

muppet_fan_1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2002
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
People give Bush a lot of hassel, but it was "the people" who demanded action after 9/11 to begin with... although poor in his own judgement, it does show that Bush is listening...
 

McFraggle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2004
Messages
2,117
Reaction score
2
No offense, but I never had anything against going to Afghanistan. However, Iraq is a different story: misleading people into believing Saddam had anything to do with 9/11 is very wrong in my opinion. Just because they're (Osama and Saddam) bad guys doesn't mean they are tight.
 

scarylarrywolf

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2002
Messages
561
Reaction score
1
And it doesn't mean they're not tight either. We can play the coulda-shoulda-woulda game all day long, but we gave Saddam the chance to prove that he had no WMDs and he didn't respond. What would you honestly do in a situation like that?
 

beaker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
7,761
Reaction score
858
McFraggle said:
No offense, but I never had anything against going to Afghanistan. However, Iraq is a different story: misleading people into believing Saddam had anything to do with 9/11 is very wrong in my opinion. Just because they're (Osama and Saddam) bad guys doesn't mean they are tight.
Very good post. I think a majority of Americans had no problem goign into Afghanistan: They attacked the US, not many civilians were hurt statisticly by the invasion, and they were under one of the most brutalist regimes. Women had no rights, and having fun(something as benign as music) was illegal. Its funny, the US funded what would have become the Taliban in the 80's and 90's..it's only when they harbored al Qaeda that things got sketchy.

As for Iraq, there is no one person who can say they didn't lie to go in there. I mean they were gonna go in no matter what, so why lie about it? Just say 'Hey, look...we want the oil, maybe we can help the people out too, and I've been planning to invade Iraq since before I took office'. Sadly, a lot of America was dumb enough to believe the lies Bush and the administration gave.

Me? I don't want neither of those clowns in office, but like most, believe Kerry is the lesser evil.

They just spent 500 BILLION on a missle defense system, that they now admit maybe would be 20% accurate. Think how many poor people in America they could have helped, how many diseases could have been cured.
 
Top