Heh... I'm actually quite lenient on censorship in anime. This is the US after all, and we have such idiotic regulations when it comes to animation period. Kid's shows especially. And I've seen topless girls in kid's anime shows. You can't even mention death in a kid's show. And I'm the only one not whining about Blue Popo.Just for fun, someone should ask Dr Tooth about his opinion on modern cgi vs older cartoons, censorship in broadcast anime, and Republicans. Discuss! :3
Whoever wrote that line needs to pay for his crimes against humanity. Really.Who else did the palm-in-the-face slap that I did when the ceramic frog told the mushroom he looked like a "Fun-Gi"? This is such digital vomit!
I'd rather see talking animals. How come we don't get movies with fully anthro'd animals anymore? Like Disney's Robin Hood or Great Mouse Detective? If they made a Romeo and Juliet movie, a tasteful one with anthro'd characters, I'd go and watch it. But this seems like a tasteless pile. The gnomes are there to be "quirky" for the sake of being quirky. And this could have even been a clever movie at some point... but it gets bogged down with cliche ridden drivel and intelligence insulting jokes straight out of a 2nd grader's joke book. And that toad thing. Even Jarjar Binks was capable of quiet subtle comedy better than that. If I saw something like that in real life, I'd feed it to a snake.Ok, just saw the trailer...wasn't as bad as I thought. At least it didn't star talking animals. I usually hate cgi cartoon movies, but there was some things here I thought were clever.
John Lasseter is a WISE man. I think I have more respect for him now than any.The film is the original idea of Rob Sprackling and John Smith who sold the spec script to Disney through Rocket Pictures. Initially, the film was going to be produced by Disney Feature Animation, but was shut down by its new chief, John Lasseter, after the Pixar acquisition. Miramax Films picked up the project and guided its production until the division closed down. The film will now be released under the Touchstone Pictures banner on February 11, 2011.
John Lasseter is a WISE man.
APPLAUSE! *PENGUIN!* nicely said!I wanna smash my face into my keyboard. I am so sick of 3D movies. Not everyone has perfect eyesight. 3D discriminates against people who wear glasses XD But while wearing glasses and watcing a 3D movie doesnt really work, I dont understand why they are pushing something thats been around since the 50s (or before?) trying to make it seem all new and exciting. And its not just movies. Its video games and even tv (whats with those 3d tvs anyway? I dont understand them. Do they make anything you watch 3d or...what...). Whats next? 3D music? Stick it in your 3d cd player and watch the soundwaves come at you?
In the end, its a gimmik that draws stupid people in to pay money for krud-tacular movies, thus fueling the cycle.
There are many theaters that offer a 3D film in 2D as well. So customers are often given a choice.I wanna smash my face into my keyboard. I am so sick of 3D movies. Not everyone has perfect eyesight. 3D discriminates against people who wear glasses XD But while wearing glasses and watcing a 3D movie doesnt really work, I dont understand why they are pushing something thats been around since the 50s (or before?)
I actually don't mind 3-D myself (and yes, you CAN wear the glasses over your glasses. I've done it before... even wear glasses when using a Viewmaster)... it's just that it is indeed a gimmick, one that temporarily saved the movie theater's butts, but a gimmick nonetheless. Problem is, I actually like the films that are slightly enhanced by 3-D, but not so much as they'd take away from the movie, nor add anything all too special that gets lost in translation if you have to see it in 2-D. Pixar has been good with this. Up was just as breathtaking in 2-D as it was in 3-D... I will say I'm kicking myself for not seeing Dreamwork's Monsters Vs. Aliens in 3-d... but I didn't think much of the film until after I saw it. I really enjoyed Despicable Me, but it had way too much stuff that had to be seen in 3-D (the Roller coaster scene... the minions' capering at the end of the film before the credits).I wanna smash my face into my keyboard. I am so sick of 3D movies. Not everyone has perfect eyesight. 3D discriminates against people who wear glasses XD But while wearing glasses and watcing a 3D movie doesnt really work, I dont understand why they are pushing something thats been around since the 50s (or before?) trying to make it seem all new and exciting. And its not just movies. Its video games and even tv (whats with those 3d tvs anyway? I dont understand them. Do they make anything you watch 3d or...what...). Whats next? 3D music? Stick it in your 3d cd player and watch the soundwaves come at you?
In the end, its a gimmik that draws stupid people in to pay money for krud-tacular movies, thus fueling the cycle.
They don't. And somehow, people are wising up to it. There's so many cheap little kiddy flicks being produced that some of them might as well go straight to video. Of course, the only way this pile of various unpleasant things will fail is if there's another, BETTER family film out there at the time of the release. If not, this will be a runaway success FOR being the only family movie out at the time. It happens.But back to the state of CGI movies. I think maybe its "easier" to use CGI to pump movies out faster for the the purpose of just making money. It seems like studios dont care about putting their heart and soul into the movies they make and instead rip off someone else so they dont have to use any kind of intelligence to write their own story...if you get what I'm trying to say