That raises the question of what constitutes a "B-level" appearance. Somewhere in the neighborhood of 10 million people saw "Kermit" on America's Got Talent. If Steve's working on something larger-scale than that, I'd love to know about it.
I agree with you, Jamie: If people are expecting The Muppets, that's who they should get -- accept no substitutes. Walk-arounds and whiz-bang technology (Mobile Labs etc) would be the only exceptions.
I've always argued that if an event is worthy of a Muppet appearance, then a real Muppet is who should appear. That's equally true from the smallest personal encounter right through to the biggest blockbuster. Any breach of that rule just ruins the magic, and Disney needs to understand that.
I agree. Dave Goelz has personally gone to small obscure book signings here and there with Gonzo in tow, and with the exception of one time with Pepe and then the Muppet live show cruise...I cant recall of Muppets not being performed by their signature performer. I can understand Swedish Chef, Statler and Waldorf, Beaker, Scooter, Rowlf, and Electric Mayhem not being performed by any one set performer. But when it comes to the "main 7" of Kermit, Piggy, Fozzie, Gonzo, Pepe, Rizzo and Animal
there should not be any fill ins.
This is why theres giant walk arounds of Sesame characters,
or the upsized Bear in the Big Blue House live show puppets...because there's a noticeable difference between these and authentic Muppets. Even the "Sweetums" used at Disneyland/WDW is certainly not even par with the real outfit
that Victor or others sometimes don. I could not agree more with ruining the magic.
I don't think to outsiders, they would understand how different the Muppets are from other famous classic family properties like
say Disney or Looney Tunes. There is an almost religious like
quality to these characters...a deep subtext of wanting to change the world, the illusion of being real, etc.
Again I agree, that to have nary a care for who performs these flagship characters just cannot do.