That is so disturbing, that is like something Hitler or Kim Jong Un would do, silencing anyone who dares speak out against their "Dear leader". Trump also says he wants to expel Whoopi Goldberg and several other celebrities just because they don't like him. Seriously, this guy wants to be a freaking DICTATOR, plain and simple.
I'd say far more like Kim Jong Un or that guy who's now the leader of the Philippines than Hitler outright. His type is
frighteningly more common in the world as a dictator than we think. Frankly, I'm
faaaar more frightened by his followers than him personally. Like I said hundreds of times before, he's an empty suit who's disturbingly insecure about himself. He
sued people for reporting
fact that didn't line up with his press releases. He doesn't so much hold grudges so much as he clenches them tightly until they dig into his hands' skin and start cutting through the flesh, with blood seeping out. And as for the fact he's the most "authentic" of all the GOP candidates, that's the biggest load. His entire platform is essentially say things terrible people want to hear, play off their paranoia, and let the crazy spread to the more reasonable types through osmosis. It's not even new points. We've
always had problem with illegal immigration. It's older than half the folks that want to vote for him
solely to punish youngsters for not being born old. It's just the same polarizing, xenophobic crap that the right
should have abandoned long ago, but are too afraid to do anything about because they'd lose those talking heads
and those votes to a third party.
And he's
still better than Ted Cruz. Imagine
worse and
serious. I could get on the rant about the entire field of GOP hopefuls, but they're the same menagerie they brought out last time. The minority and or woman candidate they pick to say "we're not racists (sexist), you are because you don't like them" that are almost overcompensatingly further to the right. The business person because a business person could run the country like a business who
ran their own business into the ground. The really wealthy guy that doesn't exactly understand what poor people are, despite the fact
they're the ones voting for him, the actually reasonable one that wouldn't be terrible that gets kicked out for being relatively liberal (because why get a candidate that actually speaks to more middle minded people and has a mild temperament?)...just the same stock characters every single time.
But some of the anti-Trump protestors aren't much better, having ten-year-olds shouting "F*** Trump!" and giving the finger. How can they be taking a higher moral ground when they're stooping to his level? Two wrongs don't make a right.
I'm going to agree
. Yeah you could write a War and Peace sized book about how, even a-politically, Trump is screwed up and his followers wouldn't change their hearts and minds. So yeah, way to help make
them look like the victims. Let him unravel himself and leave the nuts that love him alone. Those type of people usually wind up being their own undoing. Sit back and enjoy the crapstorm that happened to their party. Protesting isn't going to do a
darn thing. He's not going to drop out of the race saying "this isn't worth it to be hated by so many people at the expense of being beloved by a terrible, vocal minority." His followers aren't going to say "Ugh...this is what we've become? Maybe we should sit out
every election and not let our bitterness and misplaced anger ravage the country."
Ugh. The far right is playing the victim again! This time, they're crying that Facebook is being biased and pandering only to the left in terms of trending news and such . . . which is odd, because I see D'ump trending more than any other political candidate out there.
But seriously? I'm getting sick of them always out on the attack of everybody, then they cry like little witches and say they're the ones being attacking by everyone else.
I mentioned this in the
Roll your Eyes thread
I totally believe that no one plays the victim like the far right. That's because of the huge amount of press, media manipulation, and social media agreeing they can pull off. It's manufactured by the condescending rich Neo-Con types who think less of working class conservatives than liberals do.
But I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. If this really is true, yeah...good job giving them ammunition to fuel their conspiracy theories. But even if Facebook wants to make amends, they're picking an
Awful cast of characters to admit something that's only possibly true but in the "pfft who cares?" way (it's Newsfeed. It's all "You won't guess what color cupcakes Disney Princesses would eat." crap). But admitting "we're wrong" to Glenn Beck? Seriously. The heck with him. He's a medicine man. A con-artist. Heck, his views pretty much
created Donald Trump. And yet he went apescat because Ted Cruz wasn't the soon to be dictator. That's the equivilant if Facebook had a Right Wing bias, he had to sit down with a militant vegan eco-terrorist. I'm not saying all voices shouldn't be at the table, but some deserve to sit at the kiddy table so they can crap their pants without getting it on anyone else.