Okay, so get this: on another forum I was recently invited to, a new theme and layout was implemented, as does happen with forums from time to time. So while the new layout isn't perfect, I mentioned what I didn't like about it in the feedback thread.
Then guess what happened? I actually got in trouble with the staff and got a warning for being rude to the admin . . . for saying I didn't care for the new layout.
Um, touchy much? I mean expressing your opinion regarding a new look or layout was grounds for getting warnings from the staff, the entire populace of YouTube would be nuked long before now. Or even when MC received its major facelift back in 2010, did we all start attacking Phil because of it?
And here's the irony: I was invited to the forum because the community was said to be friendly and respectful towards difference of opinions as opposed to another forum that a number of the people left where apparently difference of opinions weren't tolerated quite well. Heck, in my warning message, I was told, "You're entitled to your opinion." Uh, does "you're entitled to your opinion," somehow translate into, "you're entitled to your opinion so long as it doesn't involve constructive criticism that we're too sensitive to handle"? Because hey, I've moderated and administrated forums before were changes were made to the layout that people weren't particularly happy with, but you know what? I've listened to the complaints and I've taken them into consideration as for what can work better regarding layouts: that's how you improve a site or a forum, by listening to the community, and finding ways you can tweak them so they can work better for the community. But somehow, this is now considered to be personal attacks against an admin just because s/he spent a lot of time on the new layout and I said I didn't care for it?
Wow. I often joke about how overly sensitive some people are today, but man . . . I guess it's really no joke after all.
Then guess what happened? I actually got in trouble with the staff and got a warning for being rude to the admin . . . for saying I didn't care for the new layout.
Um, touchy much? I mean expressing your opinion regarding a new look or layout was grounds for getting warnings from the staff, the entire populace of YouTube would be nuked long before now. Or even when MC received its major facelift back in 2010, did we all start attacking Phil because of it?
And here's the irony: I was invited to the forum because the community was said to be friendly and respectful towards difference of opinions as opposed to another forum that a number of the people left where apparently difference of opinions weren't tolerated quite well. Heck, in my warning message, I was told, "You're entitled to your opinion." Uh, does "you're entitled to your opinion," somehow translate into, "you're entitled to your opinion so long as it doesn't involve constructive criticism that we're too sensitive to handle"? Because hey, I've moderated and administrated forums before were changes were made to the layout that people weren't particularly happy with, but you know what? I've listened to the complaints and I've taken them into consideration as for what can work better regarding layouts: that's how you improve a site or a forum, by listening to the community, and finding ways you can tweak them so they can work better for the community. But somehow, this is now considered to be personal attacks against an admin just because s/he spent a lot of time on the new layout and I said I didn't care for it?
Wow. I often joke about how overly sensitive some people are today, but man . . . I guess it's really no joke after all.