sarah_yzma
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2002
- Messages
- 4,432
- Reaction score
- 80
hmmm my favorite word is monotonous, but whatever floats your boat.....or.......nevermind it ain't child friendly!
Sarah
Sarah
Luke, I know ya worked briefly for the WWF in 1997...but I think you are assuming things. Look at the audience at the WWF shows on tv, go to Toys R US and any toy store and notice the endless amounts of watsed plastic, video games, etc on the WWF. Your living in a fantasy world thinking the WWF doesnt cater to kids.Originally posted by Luke
Once again Cory, you need to understand things before assuming them. The WWE definitely does not target the 12-17 demograph anymore - that was back in the late 80's/early 90's when the shows were more suitable for kids. As their viewing figures began to drop as kids got older and turned into teens, then adults they changed the shows to be more suited to their age groups. Thats why the pace changed in the 90's with the whole Stone Cold/Rock 'Attitude' era
I didn't say they don't cater to kids in some ways - i just meant it is a 'filler' market for them. I've got a lot of friends still working there and the main market they aim at really does seem to be a little older now - you only have to look at the plot lines for that and the introduction of the violence and scantily clad girls. Yes, i did some live shows for them and at least 70% of the audience were over 16, and if you look at the crowds on TV there seems to be a lot less kids than say back in the early 90's. I'm not sure of the percentages but a large proportion of video games players are late teens/early adults now so i think the WWE are clever to target it as yes, they can draw sales from their child audience too. However from all i've seen and heard, over the last few years the merchandise aimed at children hasn't been selling all that well as it used to - most of the time i go to the shops i see WWE figures and playsets just sitting there. I just think as they are starting to target slightly away from the kids without excluding them totally they are also getting bored with the new elements being introduced.Originally posted by beaker
Luke, I know ya worked briefly for the WWF in 1997...but I think you are assuming things. Look at the audience at the WWF shows on tv, go to Toys R US and any toy store and notice the endless amounts of watsed plastic, video games, etc on the WWF. Your living in a fantasy world thinking the WWF doesnt cater to kids.
Aw, now that is the real point! I think if parents gave their kids lots of hugs and attention, and instilled a sense of wonder with their child's viewing habits(thank gosh for shows and movies I had back in my day) it would be much better than using the tv as a babysitter.Originally posted by Jackie
I think we have to stop focusing on how Television is ruining our childrens lives and start focusing on how parents ruin their childrens lives by not being responsible parents. If a parent can't take the time to monitor what their child is watching, what's the point? There is an explosion of quality kids television out there. Block out the bad channels and allow your kids to watch the good stuff. It's not hard to do, but parents just seem to not care.
Yeah I miss that. I still remember when the HBO music would play and my mom would come running in and saying to me "WHAT ARE YOU WATCHING ON HBO???" I would say.."Fraggle Rock!" and she'd be like "Oh okay." and wait until it started before she left the room. LOL!Originally posted by frogboy4
I agree with that statement. My folks were busy people, but they monitored what I watched. I remember when I was seven; we weren't allowed to watch Three's Company. Seems funny now, but it was considered rather racy twenty some-odd years ago. We'd flip it on and my folks would catch us in less than 90 seconds - and that was in a four-story house! Ahhh, back in the days where parents had that weird kind of magic.