I didn't much care for Hop when it was just a teaser with a bunny on the drums, but I said, I'll give it a shot after the next trailer. Now, I like the idea of an Easter Bunny who winds up screwing up and having a nasty secondary character ruin the holiday... but then again, that's the plot of the Rankin Bass special "Here comes Peter Cottontail." Had this been an entirely CGI film, I'd give it some stock, but it takes a detour into "The Chipmunks was a surprise hit" land... and I betchya half to 90% of the action takes place with the generic dude he crashes with and his generic love interest. Just like Chipmunks and Garfield and Yogi Bear... at least this time they aren't ruining a perfectly good authoritarian nerd by making them an "aw shucks" lovable lug. I HATE lovable lugs. The pooping Jelly beans bit was insanely immature. What is it with Tim Hill and devouring fecal matter? I'm surprised he didn't rewrite the script so Gonzo got his message in Poopy'O's.One film that I'm on the fence about is "Hop". Sure, the initial pitch looks like crap-on-a-stick, but the ad made me giggle in parts. Maybe that's Russell Brand's doing as the voice of this bunny or the obnoxious fact that he poops jellybeans. That should have annoyed me but didn't! I think it's because the film is by the makers of "Despicable Me" who have traded in the goggled alien minions with yellow baby chick minions.
As for the Chipmunks sequel... well, I'm shocked they found a director WORSE than Tim Hill for one. it had some great concepts with the Chipettes and having the Chipmunks go to school... but half the other concepts were absolute fail. I said it a hundred times, do we REALLY give a crap about Dave's loser nephew? Did we really need another forced lovable lug trying to get some generic girl? What's with these kinds of movies and unmotivated love stories with Mary Sues? And as I've said every time I brought this movie up... there was NO call for Nascar's mole or the multiple tie ins to Meerkat Manor.
For the record... Speed Racer I give credit for at least WATCHING the series and knowing the character's names and core personality traits. At least the Mach Go didn't have a sassy African American comedian voice, like they felt they HAAAAD to do with Gadget. You know what the worst part about that was? The sassy comedian Gadgetmobile was retconned for 2 DTV movies (written a million times better than this film was). Thankfully it didn't resurface in Gadget and the Gadgetinis. But those movies really hurt Gadget as a franchise. And Airbender only went to prove how sucktastic and lucky M. Night Scooby-Doo was as a director. Had they given the job to someone competent, it would have been a far more enjoyable film. Though I still say it resembled Harmony Gold buying up the series and dubbing it into one movie.
Though I still state, there is NO CALL for the Smurfs to have to go to New York City in mundane times to do mundane things and act shocked that those things exist, like every movie that ever did that. Only time it worked (and barely) was Fat Albert. And that's only because the movie turned into a sweet tribute to the kids Cosby based the comedy routines on.