• Welcome to the Muppet Central Forum!
    You are viewing our forum as a guest. Join our free community to post topics and start private conversations. Please contact us if you need help.
  • Christmas Music
    Our 24th annual Christmas Music Merrython is underway on Muppet Central Radio. Listen to the best Muppet Christmas music of all-time through December 25.
  • Macy's Thanksgiving Parade
    Let us know your thoughts on the Sesame Street appearance at the annual Macy's Parade.
  • Jim Henson Idea Man
    Remember the life. Honor the legacy. Inspire your soul. The new Jim Henson documentary "Idea Man" is now streaming exclusively on Disney+.
  • Back to the Rock Season 2
    Fraggle Rock Back to the Rock Season 2 has premiered on AppleTV+. Watch the anticipated new season and let us know your thoughts.
  • Bear arrives on Disney+
    The beloved series has been off the air for the past 15 years. Now all four seasons are finally available for a whole new generation.
  • Sam and Friends Book
    Read our review of the long-awaited book, "Sam and Friends - The Story of Jim Henson's First Television Show" by Muppet Historian Craig Shemin.

"The Muppets" Official US Poster and Standee

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,710
That's a long discussion I've had a million times already. I don't want to go into the whole backstory about how they screwed it up... but these sequels are the reason that Weinstine isn't doing the Fraggle Movie AND the reason I'm glad they aren't.

Hoodwinked 2 was ruined by studio meddling. Corey and his brother were kicked off the picture somehow, they hired hack script doctors who rewrote the script to be edgier (now where have I heard that before?), then they sat on it for a year to make it "even better" (I swear they added bad ADR jokes), and quietly popped it off sometime near the end of April when NO ONE is going to the movies. At least no one who wanted to see that. One can only imagine how they would've screwed up Fraggle Rock the same way.

Scream 5 quickly tiptoed through a dark room quietly, not even kicking over the garbage can, and no one noticed it or cared. I still don't see what purpose another Spy Kids movie serves other than taking Robert Rodriguez and delaying the Jetsons movie another decade (that may be a good or bad thing). Even though the Smurfs looks icky, even I'd rather see their film than another SpyKids... and I dug the first one.

Our Idiot Brother (the ONLY original movie they have) has cult potential. Other than that, I'm just waiting for them to go bankrupt. They mismanaged their own company, they need to face the consequences.
 

RedPiggy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2008
Messages
5,125
Reaction score
400
DH said:
What Disney don't seem to realise is that the Muppets always survived on their inherent charm and good character. They had a home made quality that endeared them towards entire generations of people for three solid decades.
I hesitate to agree. While there is plenty of story potential, "guest stars" have been a focus for a looooooong time, as though no one would watch a Muppets-only show/movie/whatever.
beaker said:
It's only because of him this whole enterprise exists...but goodness, what world does he inhibit? The Muppet Movie and Muppets Take Manhattan existed in the real world, hence why I took issue with MFS. This film doesn't seem grounded in reality at all. "Anytown USA"? Fantasy romance cgi sequences? The beat, pacing and pop is all off with the trailer as well...some of it works, and is what fans will go gaga over, and rightfully so.
You know how Gary Stu's/Mary Sue's are ultra-perfect characters who tend to be just the author writing themselves into a plot and making it according to their fangirl/boy's dreams. Look at the humans' names: Gary and Mary. Look at the plot: A nostalgic throwback in which the author has basically written himself in.
I eagerly anticipate the movie ... but ... it's a fanfic. :smile:
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,710
The only thing that I'm still concerned about is the extent where the two human characters are used. However, unlike all the clumsily added in love subplots with humans in all the kid's movies I've seen, this movie has potential to do good on it and make it feel real. I mean, these are the masters of the Bromantic comedy... Forgetting Sarah Marshall and all that. Sure, they can't go THAT far with it. That and both actors actually WANT to be in the movie AND can act. Unlike, say, Yogi Bear.
 

RedPiggy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2008
Messages
5,125
Reaction score
400
I kinda get the impression (based on the parody trailers) that they "get" what their presence might do to the film and plan on exploiting it. Everything they've done so far just screams fanfic ... and I don't mean it as an insult (I can't stand it when fanfics are automatically dismissed). I feel as though whatever we see of their romance will be explained as how the Muppets have inspired them. I mean, Gary wears a suit, Mary wears a pink dress with purple accessories ... they're trying to be Kermit and Piggy in their fantasies (one wonders if the dance fantasy will have something akin to The Moment It Happens or whatever the title is playing). I know when I daydream about getting married, He'll Make Me Happy is always played, LOL. Here we have (according to trailers, anyway) two people who we know will most likely end up together, fight over really dumb stuff, but fantasize about their romance. I get the impression that human participation will be framed by how inspirational and Muppetational the Muppets have been and can be.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,710
I kinda get the impression (based on the parody trailers) that they "get" what their presence might do to the film and plan on exploiting it. Everything they've done so far just screams fanfic ... and I don't mean it as an insult (I can't stand it when fanfics are automatically dismissed). I feel as though whatever we see of their romance will be explained as how the Muppets have inspired them.
And I wonder if there's going to be some sort of sarcastic backhand with the human relationship. I know a LOT of sappy stuff that's put into cartoons to mock the fact they have to put something sappy in there in the first place. Either way, at least we have people who KNOW how to write movies about relationships at the helm of this picture, instead of some clumsily added forced romantic subcontext for girls in the audience, like said bad kid's movies. There was NO CALL for the romance in Yogi Bear to be between anybody BUT Yogi and Cindy. Too bad they had to put a random Mary Sue park ranger in the movie and NOT put Cindy in there. I'm sure there's something like that in the Smurf film, but Neil Patrick Harris can ACT!
 

dwmckim

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
2,874
Reaction score
848
You know how Gary Stu's/Mary Sue's are ultra-perfect characters who tend to be just the author writing themselves into a plot and making it according to their fangirl/boy's dreams. Look at the humans' names: Gary and Mary. Look at the plot: A nostalgic throwback in which the author has basically written himself in.
I eagerly anticipate the movie ... but ... it's a fanfic
I kinda get the impression (based on the parody trailers) that they "get" what their presence might do to the film and plan on exploiting it. Everything they've done so far just screams fanfic ... and I don't mean it as an insult (I can't stand it when fanfics are automatically dismissed). I feel as though whatever we see of their romance will be explained as how the Muppets have inspired them. I mean, Gary wears a suit, Mary wears a pink dress with purple accessories ... they're trying to be Kermit and Piggy in their fantasies (one wonders if the dance fantasy will have something akin to The Moment It Happens or whatever the title is playing). I know when I daydream about getting married, He'll Make Me Happy is always played, LOL. Here we have (according to trailers, anyway) two people who we know will most likely end up together, fight over really dumb stuff, but fantasize about their romance. I get the impression that human participation will be framed by how inspirational and Muppetational the Muppets have been and can be.
That's EXACTLY the tone i got from reading the script and i'm sure Segel worked with Bobin to make sure that's what carries into the film. Gary/Mary may be the human leads but they're there to serve the Muppets and let them carry the film (unlike the last few projects with human leads). There's a reason why Walter is there with Gary/Mary (and why he's named Walter and not say, Larry). Now granted, it's clear that a lot has been changed since the early draft i've seen and final project but i take it all changes have been for the better. In the early draft, the first ten minutes were the primary area of concern in regards to lack of Muppets, but the rest of the film is Muppets Muppets Muppets.
 

Duke Remington

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
491
It took me forever to realize something painfully obvious... but Walter...Walt... Walt Disney.....Disney productions... do the math.
I thought the same thing too. I just was never able to figure out how to describe it with words.
 
Top