Yes, actually. I do. I work for a company owned by the same company that owns the Muppets. This is not a brag, it's just a fact. I know how these things work. Not that it takes somebody inside the system to understand that, of course, and I'm not being an annoying know it all. I'm speaking from my experience, that's all.
No offense intended at all, but you're being a little naive. I'm as big of a fan as anybody here, but I'm not going to blindly follow along until more facts come to light. Henson's kids are not saints. There's no such thing, especially in business.
Henson has been dead for almost thirty years. The company he started is not the same company it was. It can't be. It is a different world now. The Henson brand name doesn't hold the same clout as it did, either, which is exactly why the company can barely get its projects off the ground. Lisa, Cheryl, and Brian Henson are merely protecting their interests. It's better for them to side with Disney than it is for them to side with Whitmire. I'm not saying anybody's hands are clean here, either - it sounds like Whitmire got too aggressive and puritanical with his opinion, and it rubbed people the wrong way.
There's no black and white here. Both sides are responsible for the current situation, and neither side is handling it with the professionalism, kindness, or integrity that has long been associated with the Henson/Muppet name.
I don't agree at all. You intimated earlier that "any fan of Henson" would understand what's going on, but this doesn't sound at all the way Jim Henson would conduct his business. No bosses or studio should trump ethical or moral positions. This is exactly why Henson took so long to sell to Eisner, why the deal was still hanging in the balance when he died - he didn't want the dirty hands of big business all over the Sesame Street Muppets. He believed in the integrity of that brand, and didn't want it used to do things like, I don't know, sell cars.
Ahem...