RedPiggy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2008
- Messages
- 5,125
- Reaction score
- 400
Well, I think there are a few implications that the Pangaea of Dinosaurs was the origin of the Muppetverse, though I guess one can argue that self-referential Henson gags don't really constitute such a concept. Still, as I've mentioned somewhere around here, there does seem to be traces of an evolution going on. Besides, now that Disney owns the Muppets, both universes can be tied together without much legal wrangling, unlike bringing in Fraggle Rock and Sesame Street and stuff. We probably won't see Kermit talking to Robbie (well, Kermit for sure, LOL), simply because the Sinclairs aren't in New York and I really can't see the logic for Kermit to just randomly head over to Oregon in the middle of nowhere. As I'm sure my regular readers are aware I like mixing the franchises, we are getting Muppet cameos, as this new Movieverse of mine will be continued in at least a trilogy, I hope. I kind of like how I've decided the Sinclairs got here. Unlike the Comeback King universe, well ... I can't say yet how they got here. But to further the idea that paleontology simply guesses about dinosaurs and their lives, we'll be treated to several theories of how they got to the modern world before we get to the real reason (one of which, the in-joke regarding my other universe, has already been mentioned).
Richfield surviving really isn't fair, but as I wanted to do a social metaphor/commentary in the spirit of the show, he's kinda necessary to make a point that will come up later as he continues his attempts to reclaim his lead spot on the food chain. This "movie" is a character study of what happens when those on top suddenly find themselves on the bottom. Richfield, so far, seems the most in control of his life, but it remains to be seen if he can keep it up.
Edit: Okay, it's not just about humbling the proud. To be honest, the original concept for this was "what if those living in an oppressive society were suddenly finding themselves in a society without oppression". Imagine a slaveholder suddenly appearing in a time where everyone of every race is free. Would their minds explode from the paradigm shift? And this isn't just dealing with someone evil like Richfield. Robbie was one of the most idealistic on the show. He's gonna get his reality checks as well.
Richfield surviving really isn't fair, but as I wanted to do a social metaphor/commentary in the spirit of the show, he's kinda necessary to make a point that will come up later as he continues his attempts to reclaim his lead spot on the food chain. This "movie" is a character study of what happens when those on top suddenly find themselves on the bottom. Richfield, so far, seems the most in control of his life, but it remains to be seen if he can keep it up.
Edit: Okay, it's not just about humbling the proud. To be honest, the original concept for this was "what if those living in an oppressive society were suddenly finding themselves in a society without oppression". Imagine a slaveholder suddenly appearing in a time where everyone of every race is free. Would their minds explode from the paradigm shift? And this isn't just dealing with someone evil like Richfield. Robbie was one of the most idealistic on the show. He's gonna get his reality checks as well.