Question about the Jim figure answered

frogboy4

Inactive Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
10,080
Reaction score
358
With the seperate licensing fee they probably have to pay, I doubt they will give it away as a freebie. I'm sure they had to pay a small fortune. Remember back when the idea was discussed a year ago? But I wish they would. :big_grin:
 

Luke

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
7,405
Reaction score
98
Jamie,

I don't think it's been explained to everyone about the seperate licensing fee yet, maybe you can explain or something ?
 

frogboy4

Inactive Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
10,080
Reaction score
358
Ken said about a year ago that a Jim Henson figure (even though the puppet appeared in the Muppet Show) would require a seperate license. I beliieve it comes from the Jim Henson Foundation, not Henson Co. They are totally seperate things and getting such a license is likely quite steep. It just shows how these figures are a labor of love for the folks at Palisades. Sure, they are in business to make money, but a Jim figure probably doesn't help them either way. I'd be surprised if they did more than break even on it. There just isn't as much desire for such a figure except with extreme fans like most of us - and I don't see how that's going to cover more than the totally seperate licensing fee.

I could be wrong on the profits, but it is a totally seperate fee. :smile:
 

WiGgY

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Messages
1,858
Reaction score
5
But who knows how much it will go for? Maybe it will be a 100 dollar web site exclusive! :eek:
 

Joggy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
646
Reaction score
6
Heh, the Collector's Club members really need their discount if that's the case. :big_grin:
 

radionate

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
3,078
Reaction score
36
Originally posted by WiGgY
But who knows how much it will go for? Maybe it will be a 100 dollar web site exclusive! :eek:
I doubt Palisades would be so foolish. :wink:
 

Luke

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
7,405
Reaction score
98
Originally posted by radionate
I doubt Palisades would be so foolish. :wink:
Yeah, $99.99 and four UPC's would be far smarter ! :big_grin:
 

pezbalubah

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2002
Messages
175
Reaction score
10
would they still need the seperate license being it's the muppet of Jim Henson and not a realistic figure of the actual Jim Henson?
 

Fozzie Bear

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2002
Messages
13,375
Reaction score
155
Stop givin' 'em ideas, Luke! :smile:

I want an action figure of ME! Wouldn't you all like to play with me? It would come with a Muley, drawing table, and harmonica with Blues Brothers glasses and magnetic hat. The exclusive would be of me and Muley as Ghostbusters.

Really, though, I'm far excited about this fig!

Foz
 

Luke

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
7,405
Reaction score
98
Originally posted by pezbalubah
would they still need the seperate license being it's the muppet of Jim Henson and not a realistic figure of the actual Jim Henson?
Whether or not it's the puppet, it was still made in his likeness. His likeness is not owned by EMTV/JHC, it is something protected by the family who are part of the Henson Foundation. I would imagine the whole idea of using Jim's name and likeness was strictly defined in the sale contract for Jim Henson Company when the family left.
 
Top