JJandJanice
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2006
- Messages
- 2,218
- Reaction score
- 153
Forgive me if I sound thick-headed here, but why is Kermit's face there?
Probley lack of Idenity for new ShowJJandJanice said:Forgive me if I sound thick-headed here, but why is Kermit's face there?
AudiencesUnlimited should have the Kermit image switched out later today.JJandJanice said:Forgive me if I sound thick-headed here, but why is Kermit's face there?
I think this show sounds great. Yes, the idea of a puppet hosted talk show is not new (Kermit did it on Johnny Carson, ALF did his own show and there are a handful of others). But if the only thing that this show has going for it is the gimmick of being a puppet hosted talk show then it will fail. And I think Henson knows that. Why do people watch Leno, Letterman, O'Brien, Ferguson, Kimmel and the other talk shows? I mean, there have been hundreds of shows just like them – that's not real original. Yet people love them. This show will need to create its own comedic style, build great enduring characters and (just like the Muppets have) surpass being seen as just a novelty puppet act. Audiences need to love the characters and humor as much as they would Conan's or Letterman's – it can't just use a felt and foam host a ratings stunt – that will wear off if the characters and format fail. I think that if this show has the same kind of "magic" that the recent "Jim Henson Improv" had (except its talk show) then this will be great. I think this could be excellent and a classic (I've been hoping for a Henson created talk show for years).Tim said:Even if it is true, I'm not impressed. I shot a pilot for a late-nighe talk show Dick Clark developed for a puppet character I did over 10 years ago. And ALF was successful with the same idea more recently. There have even been local puppet-hosted talk shows around for years.
To EVERYONE except the Disney legal team, any non creature shop/fantasy puppt created by Henson company before or after the Disney buyout is considered a "Muppet"...be they Muppet Show, fraggle Rock, Sesame Street, Bear, or even Animal Jam. It's all Muppets. Otherwise Muppetcentral would no longer even talk about Sesame Street, Bear, or Fraggle Rock since they are all legally seperate.TogetherAgain said:But check the second link (if it's working. If not, try hitting "refresh") It says that's it's Jim Henson Company, with new Muppet characters. Meaning, not the "Classic Muppets," but new characters entirely, that are not owned by Disney.
Edit: Yeah, what muppetperson said. (I've been ziffled.)
but "Bear" and the "Classic Muppets" (ie: kermit, piggy, gonzo) ARE Muppets. didnt Disney buy that word? Muppets? Muppet?beaker said:To EVERYONE except the Disney legal team, any non creature shop/fantasy puppt created by Henson company before or after the Disney buyout is considered a "Muppet"...be they Muppet Show, fraggle Rock, Sesame Street, Bear, or even Animal Jam. It's all Muppets. Otherwise Muppetcentral would no longer even talk about Sesame Street, Bear, or Fraggle Rock since they are all legally seperate.
a_Mickey_Muppet said:
but "Bear" and the "Classic Muppets" (ie: kermit, piggy, gonzo) ARE Muppets. didnt Disney buy that word? Muppets? Muppet?