ravagefrackle said:
the ideas behind these shows are not interesting or intriquing in the least,
The term reality does not mean the idea behind it always, it some time just means the d
irectorially style and look of the show. Take any standard sit-com like say, Seinfeld, Full House, or The Cosby Show. Take any epsidoe of the show but change just a few things; use real full sets/locations (360 degrees of walls, not half a room with no ceilings and sunch); take out the live studio audiance (or laugh track), and film it with moving unlocked "rawer" cameras (rather than the standard 3-pedestal-cameras); executives would refer to it as a "reality sit-com" to identify it is not your standard "traditional" sit-com. The writting, acting, and plots could be exactlly the same as the tradional show. The term has somehow taken on a new meaning to mean any show not shot
directorially in the 3-camera fasion. I think it is a stupid as many of these shows in the reality style are anything but realtiy (they have writters, scripts, actors, ect.). The Muppet Show could have been shot in "reality style" with out changing any of the writting or content.