Bean Bunny
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2002
- Messages
- 412
- Reaction score
- 0
I guess Hit will have to edit Kermit out of the specials, unless they pay Disney a fee to use him.
So the Henson Family/Legacy, not the Company, own the "Jim Henson" brand name and logo? Well, in that case, there's no excuse.Luke said:Out of interest why can you automatically understand why Disney could not use the Jim Henson brand name ? EMTV never bought the Jim Henson brand name, just the company (which included his name in the title) yet their agreement with the Henson family still allowed them to use his name. The Henson's could have easily made EMTV change the name. The reason why Disney are not using the name 'Jim Henson' is either because they do not want to, or the Henson's do not want them to. If both parties wanted i'm sure it could be arranged.
That would be sort of extreme, wouldn't it? If you're talking about the Muppet movies that are already out on video, DVD, etc, Disney would gain absolutley nothing by spending all the money to edit existing work. The characters are in the movies. End of story.McFraggle said:I am hopeful that this will mean Fraggle Rock will at the very least become syndicated again in re-runs. Also, just wondering will Disney have to edit the Sesame Street characters out of the Muppet movies.
Yup, you are correct sir. The name belongs to the Henson Legacy. All this name business is either because Disney don't want to use it (or pay to use it) and probably want to make it clear they now own the characters, or that the Henson people think having Disney projects labelled "Jim Henson's Muppets" would get confused with their own projects. Eitherway it could have been different, which is why it ticks me off. The whole Jim Henson thing stands for quality and tradition, and with both Henson and Disney camps going on about how the characters are timeless and "evergreen" i would have thought it was something they could have used to emphasise that.BoyRaisin2 said:So the Henson Family/Legacy, not the Company, own the "Jim Henson" brand name and logo? Well, in that case, there's no excuse.
I'm not totally sure but from what i gathered thats not correct. All the Muppeteers are retained exclusively by the Henson Company but work for them on a freelance basis. When another company (Sesame, Disney) want to use them they hire them out through the Henson Company. This is the reason why you rarely see the Muppeteers working on non-Henson related projects. At least thats what i think, if its wrong i'm sure one of the puppeteers around here will correct me. I think Sesame have their own talent pool but also hire people like Clash and Oz from Henson.Jennifer12 said:I'd imagine that Kevin Clash and the rest of the puppeteers are paid on a contracted per-project basis. Sesame Street pays him to do Elmo, and Disney would pay him to preform Clifford. Kind of like a movie star.
Exactly what I was thinking, which is why I can understand (to a certain extent) why they might not want to use it. But since "Jim Henson" is technically not owned by a corporate foe, why not use it?Luke said:All this name business is either because Disney don't want to use it (or pay to use it) and probably want to make it clear they now own the characters, or that the Henson people think having Disney projects labelled "Jim Henson's Muppets" would get confused with their own projects.