I liked Frozen quite a bit actually, but I still find it a bit overrated. You can still like something while finding it to be overrated.
You see... this is what I'm talking about. Overrated does NOT equal "I hated it."
Personally, I'm just glad that there's a kid's movie out there that resonated with people and has an audience without having to make dated hip hop references come out of talking (real) dogs with CGI Clutch Cargo lips. Shudder... Or, not quite as bad, yet another sequel to Ice Age. Now THAT'S an overrated franchise that makes much more money than it should. Don't get me wrong, I like Sid and Scrat, but the only reason I bothered with the fourth film was the Simpsons short. And the film itself was like watching 2 different movies. A fun, but not very high quality romp with pirates and a crazy grandma, and a tedious, cliche ridden tween drama/com about fitting in. The film exists only for money, and no doubt it will rival Land Before Time in sequels someday. And that was one of the
better ones. There's all these awful third and fourth party CGI movies out there. And thankfully the public at large is starting to say "no thanks" to these weaker efforts. I'm quite happy the Legends of Oz movie failed and got horrid reviews.
I get that Frozen is overrated, and I'd tend to agree on that, actually. But the trend that bothers me is the nonstop
lame kiddy movies that only exist to ride the coat-tails of something else. Essentially what I'm saying is Marmaduke got a movie. Someone thought a not at all liked, not even in it's prime 50 years ago comic strip about a dog that eats pies off a window sill was a valid concept for a children's movie, and selling it with "he's wearing sunglasses! Word Up, Homies! He's in Da Hood." Even if watching Frozen was high torture for me, I'd rather see films like Frozen than "poorly updated CGI character who suddenly wears sunglasses and uses dated 90's slang unironically."