MuppetsRule
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2002
- Messages
- 1,605
- Reaction score
- 1,756
I apologize if my last post may have seemed a little pointed or directed at Sidcrowe.
However, to paint with a broad brush that those that support the decision to go to war with Iraq are less-informed, less-caring, or less-understanding of the ramifications of that decison is arrogant and offensive. We all understand the horrors of war. I don't need to go to my local retirement village to talk to veterans to understand that (my grandfathers served during the World Wars and my father in the Korean War, my roommate served during the Gulf War). I cringe everytime I hear the term "shock and awe". Shocked and awed that mankind can find bigger and better ways to kill each other? I cried when they first broadcast the news of Baghdad being bombed. Just because someone supports the decision to invade Iraq does not make them less-caring. We all want peace but sometimes war is justified and necessary. Just like those opposed to the war, the supporters did their research and have drawn their own conclusions.
To this point this forum has been, for the most part, very informative on bringing up many valid points for both points of view. To characterize those that support the war as less-informed or less-caring however does little to further the debate. As does characterizing those that oppose the war as anti-American.
P.S. Comments such as "Oops...just tripped on an empty whiskey bottle. The Bush daughters must've left it behind" are cheap, partisan, and irrelevant to the current issue. Many of us during our college years emptied a few of those whiskey bottles you may have tripped on. I apologize for not being a neater drunk.
However, to paint with a broad brush that those that support the decision to go to war with Iraq are less-informed, less-caring, or less-understanding of the ramifications of that decison is arrogant and offensive. We all understand the horrors of war. I don't need to go to my local retirement village to talk to veterans to understand that (my grandfathers served during the World Wars and my father in the Korean War, my roommate served during the Gulf War). I cringe everytime I hear the term "shock and awe". Shocked and awed that mankind can find bigger and better ways to kill each other? I cried when they first broadcast the news of Baghdad being bombed. Just because someone supports the decision to invade Iraq does not make them less-caring. We all want peace but sometimes war is justified and necessary. Just like those opposed to the war, the supporters did their research and have drawn their own conclusions.
To this point this forum has been, for the most part, very informative on bringing up many valid points for both points of view. To characterize those that support the war as less-informed or less-caring however does little to further the debate. As does characterizing those that oppose the war as anti-American.
P.S. Comments such as "Oops...just tripped on an empty whiskey bottle. The Bush daughters must've left it behind" are cheap, partisan, and irrelevant to the current issue. Many of us during our college years emptied a few of those whiskey bottles you may have tripped on. I apologize for not being a neater drunk.