Wha?? Funco purchased a Muppet license so of course they're going to use it on all the lucrative products they offer. If cupcake holders didn't make money, they wouldn't make them.
Exactly the point I was trying to make. The Cupcake figures (not holders, figures for some reason shaped like Cupcakes) just didn't seem to move. They were intended for a female collector, going for Disney princesses and Fairies and MLP:FIM licenses. Suffice to say, the Muppet ones were probably not produced for the whole line's failure. And it wasn't exactly their first flop of a toyline. They had some
really stupid flat, angular figures that didn't really look all that good that only produced a couple Simpsons and Batman before being discontinued. Meanwhile, Pops, blind boxed figures, and Bobbleheads still manage to have healthy sales.
Still find it funny that Disney gets any blame other than having a license purchased. Glad to know I'm not the only one who knows that.
I also think Disney/ABC did as much as they could to minimize any potential damage of a watered-down special. It was barely promoted. However, the Muppets were great in it. I don't think it harmed them at all. They were the bright spot. Gaga has since admitted to personal struggles at the time that program was taped. She bears the responsibility for it. Not Disney.
While I don't think the special was great by any means, I find the amount of hate it gets just ridiculous considering:
A) it was
never meant to be an annual classic, and was only made to promote and album and a movie.
B) we've sat through admittedly much worse for 5 minutes or less of
just Piggy and Kermit with maybe like one more character
and C) the Liberace episode of The Muppet Show was
far far far far worse in terms of celebrities upstaging the Muppets. He did it on
their own show!