Well, pardon my error, then. As this policy change was not particularly well advertised, I was unaware. Now that I have carefully examined the thread, I see that you casually mentioned taking "a bit of a stance" in that direction, in a post that was directed to a single, specific member. Those of us who, at best, merely skim a post that is directed to a specific individual other than ourselves have had no way of knowing of this policy. Might I advise you that, in the future, it could be more helpful to make a general announcement of such things. Since, as you say, your intent is to give authors an incentive to finish their stories, it would be useful for authors to know that the incentive exists.
Furthermore, I'm concerned about the inconsistency this policy creates in the Index. Of the five tales I have currently listed as "unfinished," I don't consider any of them to be permanently so. In your only post prior to this one that mentioned this policy, you said that tales would not be added to the "unfinished" list unless the author had notified you that it would remain unfinished. In that case, should all five of the stories listed under my name be removed? That's not the sort of index you originally presented. The spirit of this index, if I recall, was to catalogue ALL stories, finished or unfinished, old or new, so that readers do not have to scour the deepest archives of the forum to try to find a particular story from long ago, and so that new readers can easily enjoy the tales that predate their membership here.
If that IS the intended spirit of this index, then I don't see the use in punishing writers for starting new tales--which, as you know, can take YEARS to complete--after the invisible deadline.