Not talking about Jim Hill here, but I hate it when journalists lie or exaggerate. For example, the New York Post article "Eisner Nears Muppet Rescue" on May 5, saying, as the title suggests, that Disney was close(r) to buying Henson, then a mere two days later, the Henson family ends up buying the company at 6am CST. Adding to that, it was revealed, that the Hensons started their pursuit two weeks before because Disney apparently BACKED OUT of the bidding then and it was Classic/Sesame REALLY nearing a deal with EM.TV, which thankfully never came to fruition.
Since that's true apparently, then what the freak was that May 5 article about then, with the "Disney may pay $100 million - $70 million in cash and $30 million in assumed debt" stuff? Even saw Neil Cavuto's show on Fox News on May 5, and on the screen it said "NYP: DISNEY SEEN BUYING JIM HENSON CO. FROM EM.TV FOR $70 MIL". And that was the first time I had EVER seen a mention--even if it was just words on a screen--of EM.TV or the Henson sale in general, so it was a head trip to me.
Anyway, I mean, what is with these multiple anonymous sources? Someone needs to make a book on this whole thing, or Muppet Central should get back into the interview business and talk with Brian Henson or Werner Klatten or something 'cause I've been going nuts!
And that's my rant.