Docnzhoss
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2004
- Messages
- 973
- Reaction score
- 14
My pleasure!sugarbritchez said:That is mighty kind of you to say that.
We would hope not. Unfortunately, it seems the driving factor in the Jackson case is money. I'm sure we all heard about the woman's lawsuit against a major department store and her alleged attempts to get money from other celebrities. I can understand the financial strain one could accrue from finding care for a sick child. But using a child's illness for financial benefit is disgusting and wrong, especially when it means handing him/her over to a celebrity without thinking about the child's welfare. Once again, I want to state that I know very little about law and that I am simply stating opinions. I know nothing of the family's situation aside from what has been reported and alleged. It just seems that the whole matter and ones similar to it could be avoided if the adults would just use some common sense.sugarbritchez said:I mean we wouldn't just hand our kids to a stranger off the streets, would we?