Yes, referring to the detail of the figures a lot of people (including myself) worked very hard on as ugly or misshapen is most definitely an insult. I know you favor more cartoony representations of things and that's okay too, but nothing Palisades did was "grotesque" in any way. McFarlane is another story. Acknowledging that you misspoke or exaggerated would be the right thing to do because your technically incorrect and poorly chosen words have greatly offended me.It's funny, as the words you use to describe grotesque are a huge selling point for me when it comes to some things (the works of tim burton and henry selick for instance) Well whats a good word for the standard Mcfarlane created, that became the standard for modern movie/game/cult collectible toys? Insanely detailed to the point of absurdity? Either way, it can't be an insult as I've always considered every Palisades toy, even for cartoons I wasnt into, a work of art.All Im saying is I notice for the last 14 years this style has been popular, it hasn't been something kids are tugging at their moms shirt tails for. Then again, I find it dishonest and lame what ended up happening...you now have this crappy standard of dinky, frail 3 3/4 figures(like Avatar, Pirates of the Carribean, DC, Marvel, Tron Legacy, etc)
that cost close to $10..yet the 6" and bigger versions only cost a couple bucks more. And the 2" two packs cost $7-9 dollars. None of it makes sense, and I often wonder if it's really something kids want
Toys I see that grab me even as a grownup(even tho I dont buy most the stuff) would be all the non Disney store toys at toys r us, walmart and target: Phineas and Ferb action figures, the Toy Story figures and buddy packs, etc. If only Mattel coulda done the same for the Muppets
When it comes to toys meant for kids, theres always going to be likeness issues. With Mario and Toy Story, theyre purely going off cgi models so its hard to mess up. But with Muppets, often all they have is lame 2001 era stock photos to go off of it seems like
Okay, I'm working on no sleep and jumping back between this and the GMA Muppet takeover's second hour. It took me a while to realize this isn't a photo manip... They definitely used the Palisades figures as models, but a more streamlined slightly cartoonish design. This is kinda what I was looking for, but I really think that they could have just repacked them and sold them in stores as well.
Anyway, I think these are what you're looking for. MC member Dearth posted about them in another thread. However, these are just park exclusives. I hope work like this makes it into wider release with more prominent placement. But here are your figures in time for xmas!
Yeah. I collect every Pez of a license I like. I wish I could get the Mr. Men set, but that's a Euro-exclusive and those are quite pricy online and if you manage to find them in stores. That's why I only have Scrooge McDuck, Mr. Bean's Teddy, and the Anteater from Pink Panther. Somehow they accidentally released the ant in the Bugz line, so they go together.yeah i seen the removable Cars pez at walmart by the xmas stuff...i want em!
Ahh! thos are so awesome!!!!!!!! i NEED em!Yes, referring to the detail of the figures a lot of people (including myself) worked very hard on as ugly or misshapen is most definitely an insult. I know you favor more cartoony representations of things and that's okay too, but nothing Palisades did was "grotesque" in any way. McFarlane is another story. Acknowledging that you misspoke or exaggerated would be the right thing to do because your technically incorrect and poorly chosen words have greatly offended me.
Anyway, I think these are what you're looking for. MC member Dearth posted about them in another thread. However, these are just park exclusives. I hope work like this makes it into wider release with more prominent placement. But here are your figures in time for xmas!