Scarecroe: That's where it gets confusing, isn't it? I guess Disney would own the rights to the movie library anyway. So what about Farscape? They'd own the rights to the 88 episodes already produced, while EM.TV (or whoever ends up with the CS) would own any continuation of the series? Oog. My head hurts.
Stevie: Jim Hill, our insider source, mentioned that Disney and Henson had discussed the idea of DC and Labyrinth in the theme parks. And as Scarecroe noted, Sony only DISTRIBUTED those movies; they don't own them. If they do put them in the Disney parks, I'm packing up for a trip to Anaheim!
BoyRaisin: The possibility of Disney closing down its feature animation division was first reported on Aint-It-Cool-News, so I didn't pay much regard to it. However, if Jamie's hearing rumblings, I'm more inclined to believe it.
Disney is scared right now because the CGI films have been doing well, both for them and other studios (Toy Story's, Shrek, Ice Age, Monsters Inc.), while traditional animated films for them and other studios have tanked (Treasure Planet, Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron). Still, Disney's biggest hit this year was "Lilo & Stitch." They'd be really stupid if they shut down features, especially since Pixar is about to bolt from them and their only in-house CGI feature was the bomb "Dinosaur." I think this is silly talk being done out of fear, but it will end soon. In the 80s, sitcoms were doing so badly that ABC actually said that they'd never air another sitcom again. This was in May 1984. In September of that year, "The Cosby Show" premiered. The following year, ABC had a TON of comedies on its roster. So if Disney is seriously considering this, I believe they'll come around on this ridiculous decision. For the sake of the animators' jobs, I hope this is sooner rather than later.
Also, if Disney owned the Muppets' catalog, count on the video deal with Sony to stop. Expect new DVDs of all the movies, totally cropped but with Brian Henson commentary.
Daniel: You bring up a possibly good point. I would think they would still want the company around, just because someone needs to run the operations on a day-to-day basis. But you never know. At any rate, Sesame won't be affected (since that's owned by Sesame Workshop anyway), Bear in the Big Blue House won't be affected (since that's produced by Disney), and if Animal Jam is as bad as I hear it is, it won't be on the air long enough for it to matter.
So the main question remains about Farscape.
And I think you're just panicking a little bit about the Kermit statue. Illegal and unauthorized Mickeys are completely different from a statue commissioned by the company who created the character!
More than likely, they'll use the Henson Company building for extra production facilities for themselves.
But hey, those are just my thoughts on the matter, and what do I know?
Y'know who'd be the best for the Muppets? Sesame Workshop. They bought the rights to the Sesame characters, then they went right on doing the stuff they always do. Unfortunately, I don't think they're in the running...