Aunty Ru, I always appreciate your advice and critique. I understand you don't like doomsday, especially when mixed with the muppets! I wholeheartedly agree! I enjoy Lisa's writing, however heart renching it may be. But it is not my style. Nor is it yours. What you are saying is that it is better to right something that has believable drama in it, rather than stupid drama where it's impossible. I never could understand soap opera's and they always ticked me off. I am deeply moved and grateful when you tell me I have potential! You remind me of my english teacher, who I LOVE a lot! As much as I love you! So when you give me that nudge or point in that right direction, i am most certainly not offended in any way! Always happy to here from you,I'm going to respectfully disagree, and then I'm going to stop posting about this topic myself, but I do want to clarify my point.
I'm not talking about an "opinion" about what is or is not professional. I'm actually talking about what is or is not professional. The word "professional" actually has a meaning of its own, independent of what people "think" about the meaning of the word. For example, if a person says "elephant," we know what that is. I don't need an opinion about what an elephant is--it is an actual thing that exists and no amount of thought about elephants (for or against) changes the "elephantness" of an elephant. When I said, "professional," here's the Merriam-Webster definition I was intending.
a : participating for gain or livelihood in an activity or field of endeavor often engaged in by amateurs <a professional golfer>
This is a forum for fan fiction. Fan fiction is not, in the traditional sense, publishing, although I do understand that technology has made little book-makers out of all sorts of folks. A book is published when it is read by a publishing house, accepted for publication and the author is paid in some form. It is not unheard of for someone to self-publish their own book first, and later have it picked up by a publishing house, but despite what you may have read on the internet, this is still quite rare. When you publish short fiction or poems, they usually give you contributor's copies as "payment," but it is still considered published. Posting your stuff online--which anyone can do--is not the same as "being published." To think so demeans the very real world of publishing. That doesn't mean that I think fan fiction is bad (I don't) and that everything published is good (I don't). But having work accepted for publication is still an honor that should not be equated with the technological equivalent of passing your notebook around to all your friends and having them tell you that it's "the best-est thing they ever read!"
The point I was trying to make with Figgie is that there is a difference between the type and quality of the writing done for drama and melodrama. Soap opera writers--and those are, I must admit, professional writers--do not usually write straight drama. They write over-blown, wildly improbably stories that would fall into the category of melodrama. Supermodel moms being kidnapped in evening gowns and held in a jail cell with no indoor plumbing nevertheless come out with their eyeliner intact three days later. Despite the privation of being locked up, the heroine still looks and smells marvelous, and the hero cannot wait to kiss her, though it has been days since she brushed her teeth. We are entertained by these sorts of shenanigans, but it is not the same caliber of writing that goes into House or Law and Order. Pretending that the skill necessary for the first automatically qualifies you to write for the second and third is not true. There is a reason they do separate Daytime Academy Awards, and save the dramatic ones for the evening show. BTW, Melodrama is also a real word with its own definition, independent of whether one likes melodrama or not. It is:
a : a work (as a movie or play) characterized by extravagant theatricality and by the predominance of plot and physical action over characterization
That's why I made a distinction between how melodrama and drama differ and the fact that I normally do not care for melodrama. Whether or not I care for it does not change what it is.
It is, in literature circles, a lessor form of entertainment, characterized by plot lines that pay no attention to the recognized rules of physics and logic, among other things. For example, in a melodrama, all the police are stupid and incompetent, running around uselessly while the hero saves the lady. Newsie wrote a silly little melodrama very capably in one of her last few posts, with Piggy playing the beleaguered leading lady, Uncle Deadly the rascally villian and Wayne (bless him) as the hero, come to save the day. No one would mistake that sort of play for, say, Agatha Cristie's "Mousetrap," because one invites you into a world where you MUST suspend your disbelief and the other merely invites you in to look at something that could have happened around the corner in this world, or even--in the case of science fiction--on some other world.
There is a professional way to write, although themes and styles vary widely (as well they should). There should be a plot with a beginning, a middle and an end. There should be correct grammer--always. There should be some reason the reader interrupts their day or life to read what is written. The characters should be recognizable from page to page and--in the event of a sequel--from book to book. These are only some of the rules about writing that characterize books that actually get published--not posted.
Fan fiction serves a particular function in fandom, and I have said before that most of the readers of fan fiction are other writers of fan fiction. It's a pretty small group, overall. Amateur fiction, which does not have to pass any sort of criteria to be posted, often deals with strong emotions and fantastical situations. Hurt/comfort is one of the largest genres within fan writing, and it basically a plotline that says, "So-and-so is hurt, and then the other so-and-so gets to comfort them." Comforting usually leads to some improbable declaration of never-before-admitted affection, and some wildly inventive, um, snuggling. (Trying to remember our audience is rather young.) I dare you to find ANY fanfiction genre which does not have oodles of stories like that. Or it can cause a scene of reconciliation and tenderness between two characters that are at odds with each other. It provides a quick rush of emotionalism, a fix, but the writer has had to put very little effort into tweaking our emotion--the situation did that without any need for the author's skill.
I apologize, Figgie, for muffining in your thread, especially since I had to explain not so long ago what it was and why it is rude. I have written a long post, taking up valuable space that you might better use to tell your story. And it is your story. You may write what you wish, and if all the muppets fall into comas or lose limbs or contract deathly illnesses and that is the kind of story you want to tell, then you should tell it. There will always be fans lined up to see that sort of story.
I think you have some real potential and you asked for help. I did what I would do with any of my students--I pointed out what I saw and redirected you in a direction that I thought would be more beneficial for the long-term development of your skill.
I suspect that my advice, overall, was unwanted and will be unheeded, and in the future I will refrain from offering it.
In conclusion, "Good post. Keep going."
Go ahead and have as much muffins as you want. *Nibbles on rasberry muffin* Yes my work is not perfect, heaven knows it needs help! Which is why we all have each other to help the other out! I always appreciate hearing from you and I feel proud of you for sticking up for me, even though it wasn't really needed at this point. But I like having you as my big sister, it makes me squeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!>tries really hard not to muffin the thread more< >fails< I understand completely that 'professional' is a real word and I know it's definition well. My point was that this is fan-fiction, and like you said, if the word 'professional' calls for published works, then it's almost meaningless on a fan-fiction forum. Also, I have to disagree that this writing style is looked down upon in writing circles. Aren't some of the great works like Gaston Le Roux's Phantom of the Opera, and Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist are all books in which an unrealistic amount of traumatic circumstances happen to the characters. Melodrama is something different entirely, and it involves being cliche. Cliche is hard not to be when you are writing for characters as classic as the Muppets.
Figgie's work isn't perfect, bit it's no Muppet Melodrama either.
That all being said, I didn't mean any offense and your advice is certainly wanted, valued, and appreciated. I know Figgie loves your stories, and I've read a few of them myself, and completely admit to you being above me on the writing scale. If I've chased Figgie's aunt away from her own story, I deserve to tied to a train track (by Uncle Deadly, of course).
Squeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!! Lisa is reading my story!! As for the dessert and desert, I forgot how to the difference, and then you said it and I was like 'oh, yeah!' And then the brake thing, boy do I feel like a pickle! Anyhoo, to hear you and all the other superior writers say I have potentioal, really made me happy!! And as for Piggy, good point. I shall have to correct meself!! Thanks again!!Alright... I finally read through this yesterday. I have a few thoughts.
1.) Figgie, you have some great potential, and I am definitely looking forward to reading more from you!
2.) Grammar. Not spell-check, but grammar. I hate to be an annoying stickler about it--I am NOT going to start giving you grief about every comma splice when most people in the world today don't even know what a comma splice is--but you seem to have one particular habit that I find very distracting. The thing is, just because spell-check says that something is a real word, that doesn't mean it's the word you want. The example that sticks out most prominently in my mind is in this last chapter, when Scooter and Lonnie keep talking about when he gets his "brake." A "brake" is something on a car, bike, or other vehicle that you use to stop; i.e. You see a deer jump out in front of you and slam on the brakes. A "break," on the other hand, is that wonderful pause in the work day when you get to eat lunch or grab some coffee. It is also something that tends to happen to bones if you don't drink your milk and/or participate in Gonzo's stunts.
Likewise, Scooter is thinking about "desert," but what he really wants is dessert. Dessert, the tasty treat you get to eat after dinner if you finish your veggies, has two S's because you always want a second helping. A desert, with one S, is a place that doesn't get a lot of rain. I know little things like that are hard to keep track of, but take it from someone who was once docked a full letter grade on a paper for repeatedly writing that a character would "role" his eyes instead of "roll" his eyes... it makes a difference!
3.) NOT to drag out the muffining any longer than necessary... but in one of your posts, you said, "I wanted to go with what the public wanted so no tribulation could start." Am I understanding correctly, then, that you decided Piggy couldn't get hurt because, at the idea of it, your readers started screaming "NOOO!"? Because if that is the case... that's a very good way to end up with a lower quality of writing. Write your story, what you need to write... not what you think your readers want to see. You'll never make everyone happy, but trying to make everyone happy is a great way to make yourself miserable. Also, try not to confuse the anguish of a good conflict with the horrified demands of "You need to change this plot point because this is AWFUL." I realize they may look similar, but there's a HUGE difference. As a general rule of thumb, around here, genuine disagreements with the plot itself tend to be very calmly stated, usually with lots of humility and a certain awkwardness that comes from not wanting to be rude. Good story telling, on the other hand, results in LOTS OF CAPS AND SCREAMS AND PANIC!!!!!!!! But again, that's not a hard-and-fast rule.
4.) You mentioned that you're still figuring out your own style, and that's true, and it's WONDERFUL. A tip regarding that... One of the hard things with Muppets is figuring out just how much physical damage they can take. Part of the problem is that even the Muppets aren't consistent about it: Gonzo drops a piano or a 5,000 pound weight on himself, and he's very flat, but still perfectly fine and able to talk and all that. Beaker and the Newsman sustain all sorts of comedic abuse, but have never needed to go to a hospital. Yet in Muppets Take Manhattan, Kermit gets hit by a cab and faces some very definite consequences that land him in a hospital with complete amnesia, and the fact that Gonzo forgets his skis when attempting his water stunt means that the next time we see him, he's covered in bandages (though he's perfectly fine by the time he gets to New York).
The real trouble with what you have happening to Piggy, then, is not that she ends up in a hospital... or that she was perfectly fine and just karate-chopped the cars. Either one could certainly happen within the Muppet universe... but not both, at the same time, to the same character. Besides which, if she was fine, then why did anyone bother to take her to the hospital? Sure, the paramedics could show up and check her out--erm, in the medical sense, I mean--but if she wasn't hurt, they wouldn't bring her in to the hospital. They might insist that she make an appointment with her doctor for the next day or something... But I'm really just rambling now. My point is, for each potentially-injuring situation, you need to decide to play it one way or the other... but not both. Trying to do both is just confusing for your readers.
And... I THINK that pretty much covers it. Again, I'm really looking forward to more soon!
Yes, a rainbow but not till the end. I am glad you enjoyed your star appearence! *Hands towel* The babies are due in early October or late September, it's late spring right now so, probably April. Go on, have a muffin, but I do have to say, I really felt like posting a few lines of Why can't we be Friends in reply to Ru and Wiggie, only to be funny. But that's just me.---------------
So...flooding aplenty...does this mean another rainbow?
Newsie's bulletin is, of course, perfectly in line with his usual mishaps...
Curious what the rain will mean for an upcoming birth. Er...how far along is she now? I'm a little lost, timewise...
(staunchly refusing all muffins. Though I read every danged one.)
------------------------
*hands tissues* Don't cry! But mesa es much feliz that you are enjoying! As mum would say: It's always darkest before the dawn!Figgie you've scared me in this story so much. But I'm still very happy! You almost killed them! *cry* ok I'm over it.