I understand where you're coming from. But this clearly is a move to off set the fact that TDC is nothing more but a tweenage girl hormone fest (with a morning break to go after those Nick Jr. bucks). They just took Toon Disney, kept it on the slope it was going, and slapped a shiny new label. And as long as they don't find some minus minded way to make it 48 episodes of Zak and Cody every day, it's not all that bad.That's disturbing. First of all it's teaching kids gender stereotypes, and to keep boys and girls separate. And we wonder why there is still so much trouble between men and women relationships! Boys are taught girls aren't worth their time ( I worked in summer camps, I know, lol).
Disney has forgotten what it was, where it came from, and it has the same old soup with a new can to look forward until the fad of interchangeable pop stars dries up. And the stockholders are too drunk off the success of overrated junk that's pulling in the big bucks to notice Bob Igor is just as bad, if not worse than Eisner. No wonder he named him as his replacement. Dude wanted revenge.
But the girl boy thing has been around forever. McDonalds does it all the time. Offering a boy toy and a girl toy (I really liked Burger King's DBZ/Powerpuff Girl bit... you got BOTH toys) almost every promotion lately. it sucks and all, but there seems to be less and less common ground with boys and girls due to the widening gap in kid's programming. Look at Spongebob, and how he transcends gender for appeal. Too bad there hasn't been another Spongebob, and everyone's scared spitless of any cartoon tie ins with anything (Where's my Chowder Kid's Meal promo? I'd even settle for Flapjack).