When you need to rant...

mr3urious

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
3,905
Reaction score
1,407
I find it real stupid that Apple is changing its pistol emoji to a squirt gun. How is this going to solve gun violence, if I may ask? Focus on getting rid of real guns first before you go 4Kids on your users, Apple. :rolleyes:
 

MikaelaMuppet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2013
Messages
10,583
Reaction score
3,104
I find it real stupid that Apple is changing its pistol emoji to a squirt gun. How is this going to solve gun violence, if I may ask? Focus on getting rid of real guns first before you go 4Kids on your users, Apple. :rolleyes:
Ridiculous.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,706
I find it real stupid that Apple is changing its pistol emoji to a squirt gun. How is this going to solve gun violence, if I may ask? Focus on getting rid of real guns first before you go 4Kids on your users, Apple. :rolleyes:
Ehhhh... because Apple doesn't have a huge team of lawyers and lobbyists to roll out to make sure change never happens?

It's like I always say, real guns are on noooo touchy basis, and there's that delightful paranoid kook paradox where militias stock up guns so they can fight against someone who wants to take their guns (so, then...uh...if no one wanted to take away their guns, they wouldn't buy any?), but if it comes to kids toys (which are disproportionate anyway) and cartoons, especially action cartoons, those are the easiest guns to take away because they're the only place a parental group actually matters.

So basically fictional guns are bad, and real guns are great. You can buy an assault rifle, no problem, but Habro would never release a classic Megatron unless it's incredibly small (which I have).
 

D'Snowth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
38,849
Reaction score
12,813
Once again, I do not understand why people praise Taylor Swift. For whatever reason, people are now talking about that one terrible song she did (oh Elmo, all of her songs are terrible) where there's a line that says something to the effect of, "Boys only want love if it's torture," and they're all (once again), praising her for being "so smart," and "so right," and "telling it like it is," and "knowing what she's talking about."

Idiots.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,706
Taylor Swift, to put it bluntly, is freaking nuts. Her songs obsessively go into territory I can only say is aggressive aggressive (as opposed to passive aggressive). One of her songs stops dead to talk about how much her relationships were screwed up. Heck, the song you're referring to, Blank Space, is rumored to be about... the Death Note. As in "I'll write your name... to kill you!!!"

She needs help.
 

D'Snowth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
38,849
Reaction score
12,813
I know I've said this before, but I'm going to say it again, since it's happened again:

I'm sick of these shootings, I'm sick of these protests, I'm sick of these politics, and I'm sick of this country.

As far as the protests go, I don't understand why people in my state feel it necessary to protest even when these shootings aren't even happening here (yet).
 

mr3urious

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
3,905
Reaction score
1,407
I know I've said this before, but I'm going to say it again, since it's happened again:

I'm sick of these shootings, I'm sick of these protests, I'm sick of these politics, and I'm sick of this country.

As far as the protests go, I don't understand why people in my state feel it necessary to protest even when these shootings aren't even happening here (yet).
And in this case, the black man in Milwaukee who was gunned down was armed and dangerous! And yet these idiots still protest over his death! :grr:
 

D'Snowth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
38,849
Reaction score
12,813
I know. That makes it worse, because now it seems like these protests happen just for the sake of protesting, regardless of who the person who got shot was. I can understand protesting over guys who were unarmed and weren't even doing anything (like the guy trying to help that autistic patient), but protesting because a thug got killed? And they took it to extremes this time: they burned out their own town because of it. But again, what gets me is when these things happen in other states, my state feels the need to protest: they shut down Graceland as a result. My dad (who's a big Elvis buff) would be ******.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,706
That's the problem there exactly. If it wasn't for a bunch of lousy cops and in one case a lousy wanna be cop who defied orders of the actual cops, there wouldn't be this high level of distrust and chaos. Mistrust isn't going to blow over, even when the cops are within their rights to do so. And even in the cases where they have been reason to, the cops seem to have found ways to bungle it up and make them look like the bad guys through dishonesty.

Like the case of the guy who hijacked a car and crashed into police officers. They had every right to take the guy down because he was actually endangering the cops. Yet the officers all fired randomly to make it sound like there was gun fire from the criminal who was otherwise unarmed. My question is why? I'm sure no one would have questioned the police shooting a guy trying to ram them with a car. But no, they had to make an already bad guy look worse through dishonest means, thus making the bad guy look sympathetic when there was no reason to.

Then the case of the body cam mysteriously cutting out when it didn't need to because that guy was also a bad egg. Unless I'm getting this mixed with another story since these are just starting to blend in at this point. There's no good guy or bad guy when everyone acts terrible.

As for the protests...well, are we more familiar with the uneventful peaceful ones in respectable communities where some of the protesters are cops themselves, or the loud, violent, ratings grabbing ones the extremely bias on both sides media loves to use to polarize everyone? To me the problem is simple. Dirty cops, the small amount of them that do things crappy enough to land on the 24/hr noise and outrage cycle, haven't been punished for their gross incompetence and/or institutional small townie racism because of a lack of transparency. No one wants to actually talk about it or do anything about it, leaving citizens to feel powerless, frustrated, and growing angrier and bitter by the incident, making them violent and furious. Which of course leads to a couple driven by madness shooters to attack the wrong people, which leads to some overpaid piece of crap talking head to say "the entire movement is terrible," making the protesters even angrier than they were, leading to crap like this happening. The lines get blurred, both extreme sides look awful, and the people in the middle trying to say in a civil manner "HEY! Something's majorly screwed up here. Let's stop and think and try and fix the problem" get booted to the side because they're not ratings friendly enough.

Sometimes I think... why do we wonder why a certain person running for president didn't just burn out a year ago? We have a media system where no one shuts the heck up, they hire "experts" to give us an opinion, we have 24 hours nonstop of sensationalism, and repeated viewings tend to emotionally ware on a person, turning them into some sort of rage monster.

All I'm saying is if these small amount of crooked cops at the very least got fired off the force instead of paid suspension, and various problems would be fixed by rational reasonable adults, I'm not saying everything would be much much better, but I feel we'd be more forgiving. Not happy, but forgiving. But it doesn't sell books, it doesn't increase ratings, it doesn't give horrible people a pulpit. It's probably going to cost money, time and effort, so better to keep a vicious cycle of people being angry at the wrong people and acting out.

That said...how come you rarely see dedicated, justice fueled cops that became cops for the right reasons come out and say "We agree there are terrible things happening and we're just as mad as you, if not more since it makes us look bad." Nope it's all absolute one side or the other with no shades of nuance and understanding in between.
 

Pig'sSaysAdios

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
6,418
Reaction score
4,644
Exactly. It's never, ever a one sided issue in cases like this, there's always more to it than it appears on the surface.
 
Top