Muppet Master
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2014
- Messages
- 2,599
- Reaction score
- 1,621
We have been really freaking out about the numbers from day 1-7, I mean there's so much more to go.
Consider that tv shows like Dr Who, Breaking Bad, My Little Pony Friendship is Magic and of course Adventure Time are INFINITELY more popular (I hate to say) than the Muppets and their films. I hate to say, again. But...an insanely well written, funny show? That could REALLY change perceptions. And it is about time.But will the diminishing returns yield a third Muppet movie? Unlikely. Disney would be wise to jump into television.
Ehhh... I really wish the TV show had more character development over guest star fawning. They did have great moments of that on occasion, but I just get the feeling that Roger Langridge did a better job in comic book form. If they were to do another Muppet Show and make it like the old one, they'd be wise to sit down, read those comics, and find out what made them even better than the original concept.I seriously do wish they'd considered Television. It might actually give them time to develop the characters. Something these movies barely seem to have time to concentrate on.
I definitely agree with you here, and that's why I like the idea floated by Bill Barretta (at least I think it was him) in the Variety article recently, doing a more Curb Your Enthusiasm type show. It would be fun to stick guest stars in every so often, but the Muppets have a lot to work with character development. Plus I love the idea of dropping the Muppets in the "real world" and seeing how people react to them.Ehhh... I really wish the TV show had more character development over guest star fawning. They did have great moments of that on occasion, but I just get the feeling that Roger Langridge did a better job in comic book form. If they were to do another Muppet Show and make it like the old one, they'd be wise to sit down, read those comics, and find out what made them even better than the original concept.
I mean, story arcs, episodes that take some of the action outside the theater.... I mean, I love the original and all, but less focus on the celebs, more focus on the Muppets.
The best episodes of MT, as I've been saying, were ones that barely took place in the show. Too bad there was like 4 of them and they were all second season. The one banished to cable.I definitely agree with you here, and that's why I like the idea floated by Bill Barretta (at least I think it was him) in the Variety article recently, doing a more Curb Your Enthusiasm type show. It would be fun to stick guest stars in every so often, but the Muppets have a lot to work with character development. Plus I love the idea of dropping the Muppets in the "real world" and seeing how people react to them.
Agreed, and frankly, in today's television world, that's the only way a show with the Muppets would succeed. The vaudeville shtick is cute, but it wouldn't secure a five season deal.Ehhh... I really wish the TV show had more character development over guest star fawning. They did have great moments of that on occasion, but I just get the feeling that Roger Langridge did a better job in comic book form. If they were to do another Muppet Show and make it like the old one, they'd be wise to sit down, read those comics, and find out what made them even better than the original concept.
I mean, story arcs, episodes that take some of the action outside the theater.... I mean, I love the original and all, but less focus on the celebs, more focus on the Muppets.
Still, I'm sure they said that very same thing circa 1975.The vaudeville shtick is cute, but it wouldn't secure a five season deal.