dwayne1115
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2003
- Messages
- 7,593
- Reaction score
- 3,316
Well I would like to see what Disney would do with The Muppet Babies.
I think one of the reasons why Disney has been sitting on Muppet Babies is because they're focusing mainly on re-introducing the classic adult versions of the Muppet characters and trying to return them to their "created for adults, but can still be enjoyed by people of all ages" roots and keep them from being dismissed as a "kiddie" property as they had been for a number of years both before and after Jim's death.Well I would like to see what Disney would do with The Muppet Babies.
I wonder if that's also why Disney hasn't rereleased the Play-Along or Sing-Along videos. With the possible exception of the "It's Not Easy Being Green" sing-along video (which has clips from a few productions Henson has retained the rights to), those have all-original music that wouldn't need to be cleared, but are aimed at younger kids.I think one of the reasons why Disney has been sitting on Muppet Babies is because they're focusing mainly on re-introducing the classic adult versions of the Muppet characters and trying to return them to their "created for adults, but can still be enjoyed by people of all ages" roots and keep them from being dismissed as a "kiddie" property as they had been for a number of years both before and after Jim's death.
Actually, Palisades went under after the Muppets license expired. You are correct that the Sesame Street line didn't get started because of the company going under, though.Also, on side-notes, Palisades sadly went under, leading to the Muppet line ending, as well as the Sesame line not getting started.
I think I mentioned this in a previous post, but recently somebody who claimed to be in charge of clearing all of the footage used on the show posted in the comments section of an interview with one of the voice actors that when the rights were cleared, it was for every possible media format in every country with no expiration date. I believe he was who he says he was, but who knows if he was lying?Here's what I don't get about the whole Muppet Babies situation: A quick check of Muppet Wiki clearly indicates plenty of episodes from the show's run have been released commercially. If use of copyrighted film footage from different companies was the problem getting the show on DVD, how come it's no problem to release them in 2004 but not in 2012? I can't say I'd ever need a box set of the show, but the fact that it was one of the first kid's cartoons to really gain an adult fanbase during it's original run and was the marketing behemoth it was in the late 80s into the 90s, putting the show out on DVD wouldn't hurt the franchise as a whole in the long-term.
You do realize that, unlike Disney, Henson has been trying to get so many projects off the ground that they've become a joke even to their fans. Disney was able to get one movie out there, and another in production. Henson tried a Dark Crystal movie, a Fraggle Rock movie, Happytown Murders, and I swear there was one more. The only movie that came out from them was a Sid the Science Kid film that got released directly to video with great apathy and ennui. To be fair, they had some CGI TV shows, one puppet based show, and a touring puppet improv group. That's good stuff, sure... but that's kinda underwhelming.But to just simply put my opinion on the table, it's not the same as when The Jim Henson Company did things.