I severely disagree. I actually prefer the going to Hades and back storyline over the time travel story. Not that I didn't love the first, that is. Now, you know what Bill and Ted movie really would have been heinous, and most non-non-nontriumphant? Biodome. Yep. True story. It was supposed to be Bill and Ted 3, but it sucked so badly, they just made it a Pauly Shore film.
Okay- fair enough. For the record, I like some parts of Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey- just not all of it. The chess match with Death scene is pretty neat- nice reference to The Seventh Seal.
The Japanese Super Mario Bros. 2 is perhaps the worst in the series (the main thing I like about it was that it wasn't available in the U.S. for so long). I don't think Super Mario 64 holds up, and I've never really liked Mario Sunshine, but I don't think those are bad enough to be called "worst sequels".
You are talking about the 1986 game that was released in the US as "Super Mario Bros. The Lost Levels" for SNES right? I thought that game was pretty good myself- it's definitely very challenging. It took some doing but my brother and I and a friend beat it a while back.
I've got Sonic Labyrinth (the Game Gear version, that is)- I like it well enough, but I haven't played it in forever. There haven't really been any Sonic the Hedgehog video games I've disliked...but I haven't played this Black Knight game- that must've only been out on Genesis, I guess. (or some newer new-fangled system, etc.)
I have played some newer video game systems and I like most all of them- but I'm generally a fan of the classic video game systems I grew up with and some that are older than me as well.
More than likely this is just moi... but I did not really enjoy Night At The Museum 2 all that much...
Really? Even with Oscar the Grouch's cameo?
Okay- well, as well all know, "the sequel's never quite as good."
But I liked it pretty well- I love both of the "Night at the Museum" movies, particularly for the bits of history that they do manage to teach along with a lot of really funny moments. I'm looking forward to the third movie that's supposed to be coming soon.
It goes without saying that Home Alone 3 is bad. But would it get so much hate if it had more (or anything) to do with the first two? I know Roger Ebert seemed to prefer the new kid over Macully Culkin. I liked Home Alone 3 better when I first saw it, and I saw bits and pieces of the fifth one (which also has completely new characters) and thought that was decent. There were a few funny scenes, like when the kid finds out he has chicken pox and everybody thinks he's screaming because "the toilet lid fell on his thing". But even as a kid, I wondered why they would just leave him home alone when he has chicken pox (with only the neighbor coming to check on him from time to time, instead of acting as a full babysitter). Isn't it against the law for a kid his age to be home without an adult or teenager present? One thing I liked about Home Alone 2 is that it had variants of so many gags from the first one, and this one didn't. If Macully Culkin was too old and didn't want to be an actor anymore, then focus on one of his relatives (maybe Fuller) being home alone, or put the wet bandits against another kid. I think it would have been interesting if Kevin had grown up to become a robber, knowing from experience what kind of traps a kid would do (of course, he'd have to have a face-heel turn at the end).
Actually, I would disagree. "Home Alone 3" is a fun movie- I like it just fine. Now, keep in mind, I tend to be a completist that will watch every movie in a series- and usually likes every movie in the series. In the case of "Home Alone"- this is a series where I absolutely LOVE the first 2- I have seen them many times over. I like the third one on its own rights- John Hughes was still involved in writing this one, so that's always a good thing.
However, "Home Alone 4" and "Home Alone 5" were much worse in my opinion. But I actually enjoyed the fifth one a lot more than the 4th. one. I appreciate that the 4th. movie tried to recreate the character of Kevin McCallister and tie things back in to the first two movies- but for the most part, it created scenarios I just couldn't see happening (like Kevin's parents suddenly getting divorced, but then they're reunited by the end of the film- I was glad for that ending, but I don't think they should've or would've gotten divorced to begin with.) And on top of that, there were really very few actual traps for the bad guys- even though I do appreciate that Marv did show up (and French Stewart didn't do too badly- but he's not Daniel Stern.)
The fifth one does an original story and adds a few new twists to it- it harkens back to elements from the first two movies, but is not a flat out rip-off either. It was actually a lot better than I expected it to be.
Of course, that said, I think the series has ended on a good note at this point and doesn't need any further sequels.
(Of course, I could say the same of other movie series that I have watched....like say, the Air Bud movies and the Beethoven movies..... Of course, Disney will probably keep milking all its cash cows bone dry, of course- Universal doesn't seem to be quite as bad with its series, but yeah........maybe it's time to let it go.) (Though I have to admit I still have enjoyed all the various movies in these series- not that they're the greatest in film history or anything- but they are cute and clean fun kid movies- and I love some classic kid movies- great pick-me-up type movies.