Here are my 2 cents...
Being nostalgic about the old days is ok at times. To be nostalgic means (and I'm quoting from the dictionary here) – to be unhappy at being away and longing for familiar things or persons. You may miss seeing the classic characters, skits, songs, and format of Sesame Street. You may want to see it back on TV. You may reminisce about the classic skits and shows, and even watch old tapes and clips. You may even share these things with others. This is being nostalgic; this is good; this is fun. But there is one thing I don't like, using nostalgic thoughts as a basis for hate. The two (nostalgia and dislike) are mutually exclusive.
I miss seeing Roosevelt Franklin, but I don't use that to justify hating Elmo. Say you enjoy Sesame Street from 1982-1987, that's fine - but to say that because of you love “old school sesame” you need attack Sesame Street of today is uncalled for.
If you want to share dislike for the current Sesame Street I’m ok with that. I don’t think everyone in the world does (or should have to) love Sesame Street of 2005. But if you want to attack it, and claim it is bad give rational, fair and unprejudiced reasons. Saying “it use to be better", or "it isn't how it use to be", or "in the 1970's Sesame Street was more fun and less annoying" means nothing as solid argument. Although I disagree, I would respect an argument of "Elmo's speech and social skills set bad examples for kids today", rather than hearing "Snuffy no longer being imaginary is stupid; thus the show now is", or “Harvey Kneeslapper and Sherlock Hemlock are gone, the show is just dumb now.”Things change.
Judge the show of today as a show of today, not as a show of today which should be exactly the same as when you were a kid. Things change - entertainment values, education techniques, social environments, performers, ideas - in 35+ years the show could not (and has not stayed the same). Just because it is different does not make it worse (it does not necessarily make it better either).
Kids like the show, kids watch the show, kids enjoy the show. That’s not to say they wouldn’t do the same to the old show – or that they would like one more than the other – but saying Sesame Street has changed a lot thus it is no longer good it nonsense. If you want to say why the Sesame of 2005 is bad, go ahead – but don’t include on your list of reasons 2005’s Street is bad things like “No more Buster the Horse”, “Snuffy is real”, or “The fix-it Shop was cooler than a Mail-it shop” – include things like “Journey to Ernie is over repetitive and boring for kids”, or “Elmo’s world focuses on one character and setting too much”, or “Baby Bear is not a relatable character”. Don’t judge Sesame of today against the Sesame of the past. Judge the sesame of today against today. Comparing it to the past will always cause a battle as some people prefer today’s while other prefer yesterday’s – and that’s a hard thing to argue which is better – unless you use unbiased, independent objections against the show, rather than just broad and subjective claims of the show dying or being killed due to change. I have nothing agaisnt reminising, I have nothing agaist critiqueing - I do have something agaist unfair, bias, and illogical compairisons as basis for argument and dislike.
I don’t know if anything I just said made any sense. It is late at night now (or should I say early morning), and I’m rambling and ranting. But as I learned from this thread – I have a right to. So hope you got something out of this post.
Hakuna Matata: you gotta put your behind in the past... Err...what I meant to say is you gotta put the past behind you… But you must never forget the ones of the past. Embrace change!