Welcome to the Muppet Central Forum!
Sesame Street moving to Netflix
Jim Henson Idea Man
Back to the Rock Season 2
Bear arrives on Disney+
Sam and Friends Book
Because it's no longer about quality, it's about money: if a show makes money, they're going to keep cranking it out, otherwise, it'll be canceled after they only air like two episodes.Seriously, why can't people make a decent sitcom anymore?
On one hand, television has always been about money, and there has always been the pressure to earn high ratings right out of the gate. I remember reading that Cheers was going to be cancelled after its first season due to low ratings but was saved by critical praise. However, with the advent of cable, there is a lot more pressure to score big quickly.Because it's no longer about quality, it's about money: if a show makes money, they're going to keep cranking it out, otherwise, it'll be canceled after they only air like two episodes.
Partners is basically one of the worst sitcoms I've seen since... well... Whitney. Other than that, there's a lot of really good stuff out there. But it's not a case of "no one writers anything good anymore" with Partners... they ALWAYS sucked at writing sitcoms. Will and Grace was an overrated gay minstrel show, and everything else they made is just loud, flamboyant, screechy, and pop culturey. And everything the did besides Will and Grace failed miserably.No, that's The New Normal on NBC, which appears to be just as awful as Partners. Seriously, why can't people make a decent sitcom anymore? It shouldn't be that hard. I'm not a How I Met Your Mother fan but they manage to bother writing scenarios that lead to jokes, instead of the stand in place screeching that both Normal and Partners appear to be wallowing in.
But that doesn't totally explain all the problems with sitcoms. There are the same pressures with dramas, but network TV has made Lost, Person of Interest, Once Upon A Time, and House recently, all of which have gotten decent reviews, and cable channels have Mad Men, Breaking Bad, Homeland, and so on. If a network can develop a hit drama, why can't they develop a sitcom?
DON'T get me started on Once Upon a Time. That show is made of Narm (it's true that TV Tropes expands your vocabulary... or ruins it). it's bad enough they're going for darker and edgier with the Disney versions of the characters... but now they're adding in Captain Hook (a turn of the 19th century play character) and Mulan (a Chinese legend... she might or might not have been real) to a series that takes place in Fairy Tale times.I wrote my post too quickly; I wanted to say there are no good traditional format sitcoms out there today. The mockumentary/flashback style shows are the only ones doing great (unless you want to count It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia); I love Parks and Recreation. But the traditional format sitcom is floundering, and it stuns me that production companies and networks could have so much trouble getting something together that they have done since 1946.Partners is basically one of the worst sitcoms I've seen since... well... Whitney. Other than that, there's a lot of really good stuff out there.
Similar case with M*A*S*H: no one watched the first season during it's initial airing because they were all watching other shows, then when they showed it again during the summer repeats, people took notice, and it jumped from like #55 in the Nielsen ratings to #2 (that and apparently the wife of the network executive insisted he keep the show).I remember reading that Cheers was going to be cancelled after its first season due to low ratings but was saved by critical praise.