Then responsible gun owners shouldn't be lumped with maniacs either, should they?
Conversely, maniacs shouldn't hide behind responsible gun owners. That's flawed logic. We can't directly after the crazies, why? Look at it this way. Not every Mormon is Warren Jeffs. When we captured him and punished him, we did it specifically to deal with him, and we didn't round up every single sane Mormon and punish them. For "responsible" gun owners to think any legislation that, at worst, would amount to a couple days more of a waiting period, and the inability to buy a thermonuclear doomsday device is the height of ridiculousness. If we ever have zero tolerance gun banning across the board because they don't want to make the slimmest of compromises that, in fact, give them more rights as responsible owners, then they ONLY have themselves and their refusal to change their culture to blame when the government actually DOES come to take their guns.
Explain to me this. How is going after illegal dealers and gigantic weaponry that you only need for combat which is specifically manufactured to kill as many people as possible going to hurt the responsible? I fail to see that. Anyone who runs to a dealership to stockpile on assault rifles every time a tragedy strikes out of fear they won't be able to own something they shouldn't couldn't
possibly be responsible. Not to mention those who alter their guns to make super guns. If you buy a DVD and rip it to your iPad, there's a huge chance you can get arrested for piracy, even if it's on your device. Yes. A DVD has more legislation than guns. Something's wrong.
Really... it's like the people who whined about seat belts being law. Yeah, if you're irresponsible and stupid, the government has to step in and be your parents to protect you from your own idiocy. Legislation might not help, but self regulation and the barest of effort on their part that they refuse to do could. They can use the term "responsible gun owner" till it loses all meaning, but if they want to keep those up, they need to change themselves. Everyone else has to, they are supposedly mature, well adjusted adults, they need to act like them. End of story.
In the words of Kenan Thompson: WHYYYY?!
Because the pinheaded Tea Party politicians still have a small amount of power. A bunch of jerkbags was elected by a loud, vocal minority of crackpots, entitled old fogies, Glen Beck Worshipping dimwitts, and passive aggressive bitter regular republicans (an the teeny tiny amount of former conservatives that became libertarians because they actually saw how corrupt and wasteful their party has become... the ones that were edged out in a heartbeat when the corporations took over), all unwittingly under the control of the greediest, most entitled, callous, and vaguely reptilian corporate stooges and rich people who just happen to have money out of nepotism. These people weren't sent to Washington to change it, they were sent to Washington to destroy it. All because of some Atlas Shrugged Bullcrap.
Rich people don't want to be told to give up a small fraction of their money to pay off a debt incurred because of some war they profited on but refused to pay for/have their spoiled brat kids fight in. Nor do they want to be told that they can't take shortcuts and cut corners that would allow for products to be safe or air quality to be upgraded to "not entirely cancerous." Basically they want to spend all day doing whatever they want like the spoiled entitled greedy stupid man-children they want to be. And then this entitled class goes on to spend a fortune calling anything that gives the poor a hand up to buy their garbage "entitlements," making the rich look like the victims of the poor.