Now, personally, this is something I cannot see happening for many many years. Firstly, There are no shows quite like that, with which to compare the demographic. Secondly, the demand isn't there, dispite what we say. Thirdly, we may need mini-movies to reintroduce them. And, heck, if we are getting mini-movies, yay! I'd love to see short complete stories about the Muppets on TV.
Well, that's the sad thing. but if the demand isn't there, they can't just hype something up? A lot of things I've seen on TV there is no call for, but they hype it up and people want to watch it.
YES! If the Bratz can release Bratz Babyz, then Disney can produce CGI Muppet Babies. And people would buy them. Because half the new generation only knows the Muppets as Babies anyway.
Well.... I'm on the fence about a new show completely. There are truely wonderful kid's shows, like Arthur and Cureous George that actually can apeal to parents that should monitor the TV viewings of little kids. But then there's loud obnoxious garbage like Super Why and the like, where they dumb things down as far as possible and pretend the medium of TV is "interactive."
So a new MB series could go either way. Plus, by just featuring them on products for a bit, it will bring interrest back to the characters, and maybe we could see some DVD's.
Again, YES! Really, does it cost that much to produce? Not compared with many other things. Heck, we fans could put together something for free...
Other than music rights, there's nothing that should stand in their way. As long as we don't get dated horrible pop stars of today cover the songs in a crummy way that no one will be happy with, It'll be great.
I don't know how they came to think that the Muppet audience was the younger age. This happend pre-Disney though, and has just continued on into there.
But...Mwoo wasn't aimed at 12-year-olds...neither was VMC, nor MFS. Don't forget that.
That I
do blame on society. Along with animation, people seem to think it's a way to keep those little brats happy for a half hour, and not a true art form. Then they sit back and watch truely juvenile crud like Judge fill in the blank and some reality show where people do dispicable things that not even poorly behaved 3 year olds are capable of.
However, my complaint is that Disney (well.... not only them, but Warners and Viacom, to be fair) gives priority towards 12 year old girls, due to the fact they like to spend a lot of money. A while back people were actually complaining that not enough 12 year old girls were watching TV, and that they were an untapped market. Now look at the Frankenstine tearing through town.
However, I will say, the decision to make Ashanti (I forget her name) the star of MOZ was definately a trick to get 12 year old girls to watch. VMC was geared towards older audiences and kids, but MFS was soley geared to kids (I think Sony could have had a hand in it), especially since they rewrote brilliant stuff Jerry came up with.
Now...The Muppets just appeared on one of the highest-ranking tv series of prime-time television, America's Got Talent. Piggy was on the Late, Late show, and Rizzo and Pepe appeared in tutus on the MDA Telethon. You can't tell me that Disney isn't doing anything.
I will say that I'm not completely right with that. I'm happy we have some TV appearances here and there. But while I really shouldn't say they're doing nothing, they're just not doing anything epic to stirr up public interrest. I mean the season sets sold pretty good. You think someone would take the hint.
Maybe they should hire whoever does the DVD's to run the Muppet Holding whatever. He seems to care. I mean, the reason season 2 was delayed was the rights issues with S1. It shows that they can do something good when they have to.
My anger is that they aren't doing anything big. They can. They just choose not to because they don't think it will make a fortune right away.
Remember boys and girls.... In the Entertainment Business, there's more emphisis on "Business" than "entertainment."