Don't forget John Carter of Mars and Jack and the Beanstalk. I don't know why these PG-13 gritty remakes of stuff is still a trend, it seems like they all tank on a consistent basis. Do they succeed overseas and bad box here not mean a lot or did some succeed here that I'm forgetting?
Yeah, John Carter too, but definitely not anything related to the
horrible edgy fairy tale fad. Not to be confused with Disney's live action remakes, which are still very Disney-ish. I'd say this is closer to one of those and still a family movie. They got
freaking Spielberg to direct this thing. It doesn't look like it's bad at all, just not something audiences will fall into. Actually, I'd say it has an air of Hugo to it, without the up its own butt-ness of being an inside reference to film school geeks.
Now, BFG is a Roald Dahl book I
should have read, but didn't. Nor did I see the animated film. There
was an animated film, right? I don't have a reference point for what they adapted properly or not. As for the other adaptions, screw
both versions of Chocolate factory. The original looks like H.R. Puffenstuff blew up all over the set, and the Tim Burton one is Tim Burtony before all else. Do a GOOD one and we'll talk. Fantastic Mr. Fox deviated into a Wes Anderson movie for the most part, but I really can't complain about that since it was my
favorite of his books of mine and I loved the film all over for being stop motion and having a great cast (the alcohol producing brother's 3 minute rampage through his office was the height of the movie for me). This film I'll admit has a good
look to it, but it's really not my thing. And I'm sure most kids haven't heard of BFG as much as they've heard of Wonka/Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. One gets constantly referenced (though exclusively through the 70's movie), the other falls into obscurity unless you were an 80's, early 90's kid.