jvcarroll
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2012
- Messages
- 1,660
- Reaction score
- 1,999
The domestic box office is no longer the priority it used to be particularly when you're talking a movie from Sony. Heck, not really with any company these days. Transformers 4 is the number one film of the year worldwide and it didn't even have an American premiere.My issue with the Rhino is that he came at the wrong time for the movie. That should have been the stinger instead of the X-Men trailer. Rhino was a little over the top, I'll admit, but for me it wasn't so much the character as the timing. It gave the film some ending fatigue when the film really ended a scene or two ago. I know the set up for the Sinister Six was supposed to be the stinger and shoved into the film because of the X-Men trailer.
But I do agree completely with Electro. There should have been more of Goblin and less of Electro. Goblin should have risen before Electro turned into Electro, probably even edging him into becoming that or double teaming earlier on in the movie. Seems they wanted to Goblin up as the big bad of the next film, and that's why he was dealt with near the end of the film. But his story was more interesting than obsessive awkward nerd being awkward.
That said, rumor or not, Sony did push the next film to 2017 at the earliest, and there are internal problems, the writer got angry at the fan reaction and left. While I don't fully believe Sony will relinquish the franchise completely, they are overreacting to the 60 Million dollar difference between this film and the first one. The entire box office was down, yet movies that have barely broke even stateside (because that's the only time it counts unless it doesn't) have been considered good enough and are getting no question sequels. It really seems either way, and it all hinges on Sinister Six. No wonder why the next Spider-Man film is delayed.
Sony's definitely re-configuring its gameplan. I mean, why even insert an X-Men bumper from Fox at the end of their movie? I think they were intending to merge their Spidey universe with the X-Men and Fantastic Four from Fox. Maybe they're thinking bigger with Disney's Marvel properties. As for another Spidey reboot, well his current world can't overlap the Avengers. The two New Yorks don't match up. The Avengers was the world's first glimpse at superheroes in Disney's Marvel universe so Garfield's Spider-man would have happened after that film and would have lessened the impact of Spidey on the city.
I still think the Rhino works just fine as he was and I liked the closing scene with the kid. I don't think that was a toss-away credits bumper. It's exactly where it was supposed to be. The problem is that the film was reshaped in production. Garfield mentioned a much more robust script and that's probably why the writer left. It's as if they took his gourmet ingredients, tossed out half of them and added cheezwiz on top. It was bright and colorful with a lot of cool stuff, but it was uneven and odd. I actually agree with both sides of the argument. This film should have been split into two pictures. As it stands, they should probably at least give this Spidey one more movie to tie up his story and I'm not sure if they should totally scrap this telling. Personally, I think they should keep going.
Sony pushed things back because their initial plan was overly ambitious to begin with. The sky isn't falling. It's okay. And really, the problems didn't start with the sequel. They began with the Lizard in the first film. His story was odd and truncated and his visual design was terrible. The chemistry between Garfield and Stone is the engine both films ran on and that's now gone. It will be interesting to see what they decide.